• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立强大的临床医生-研究人员合作关系,以促进临终关怀和姑息治疗研究的成功。

Building Strong Clinician-Researcher Collaborations for Successful Hospice and Palliative Care Research.

出版信息

J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Feb 1;24(1):64-69. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000818.

DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000000818
PMID:34873127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8720061/
Abstract

Hospice and palliative care research aim to build a knowledge base to guide high-quality care for people with serious illness and improve their quality of life. Considering its focus on patient and family caregiver's experiences, hospice and palliative care research activities primarily take place in real-world clinical settings where seriously ill patients and their family caregivers receive care (eg, nursing homes, clinics, inpatient units). Conducting research in these settings poses many challenges because researchers, clinicians, and administrators may have different priorities-and scientific control is difficult. Therefore, clinician-researcher-administrator collaboration in planning and conducting studies is critical for successful hospice and palliative care research. For an effective collaboration, clinicians, researchers, and site administrators must be considered equal partners. Each collaborator brings their unique expertise, knowledge, and skills that when combined can strengthen scientific rigor, feasibility, and success of the project, as well as have study outcomes that are more translatable to real-world practice. However, little guidance exists to give actionable steps to build collaborative partnerships for hospice and palliative care researchers. The purpose of this article is to describe the process of forming successful clinician-researcher-administrator collaborations through five phases of the research life cycle: idea generation, partnership, proposal writing, research process, and dissemination. Exemplars are drawn from the authors' experiences conducting collaborative research and highlight strategies and resources for successful hospice and palliative care collaborations.

摘要

缓和医疗与姑息治疗研究旨在构建知识库,以指导为重病患者提供高质量的护理,并提高他们的生活质量。考虑到其对患者和家庭照护者体验的关注,缓和医疗与姑息治疗研究活动主要在真实临床环境中进行,重病患者及其家庭照护者在这些环境中接受护理(例如,疗养院、诊所、住院病房)。在这些环境中开展研究存在诸多挑战,因为研究人员、临床医生和管理人员的优先事项可能不同,而且科学控制也较为困难。因此,临床医生-研究人员-管理人员在规划和开展研究方面的合作对于成功的缓和医疗与姑息治疗研究至关重要。为了实现有效的合作,临床医生、研究人员和现场管理人员必须被视为平等的合作伙伴。每个合作者都带来了他们独特的专业知识、知识和技能,这些知识和技能结合起来可以增强项目的科学性、可行性和成功性,并使研究结果更能转化为实际实践。然而,对于缓和医疗与姑息治疗研究人员来说,几乎没有指导如何建立合作关系的具体步骤。本文的目的是通过研究生命周期的五个阶段来描述形成成功的临床医生-研究人员-管理人员合作的过程:想法产生、伙伴关系、提案撰写、研究过程和传播。实例取自作者进行合作研究的经验,并强调了成功的缓和医疗与姑息治疗合作的策略和资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd8/8720061/b940961fb422/nihms-1742214-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd8/8720061/b940961fb422/nihms-1742214-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acd8/8720061/b940961fb422/nihms-1742214-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Building Strong Clinician-Researcher Collaborations for Successful Hospice and Palliative Care Research.建立强大的临床医生-研究人员合作关系,以促进临终关怀和姑息治疗研究的成功。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Feb 1;24(1):64-69. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000818.
2
Academic-Clinical Collaborations to Build Undergraduate Nursing Education in Hospice and Palliative Care.学术-临床合作,构建临终关怀本科护理教育。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2023 Jun;49(6):13-18. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20230515-01. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
The 2023-2026 Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Research Agenda.2023 - 2026年临终关怀与姑息护理护士协会研究议程
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2023 Apr 1;25(2):55-74. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000935.
4
Hospice and Palliative Care for Undergraduate Nursing Education: Results from a Delphi Study.本科护理教育中的临终关怀和姑息治疗:德尔菲研究的结果。
Home Healthc Now. 2023;41(4):197-206. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000001178.
5
Increased access to palliative care and hospice services: opportunities to improve value in health care.增加姑息治疗和临终关怀服务的可及性:改善医疗保健价值的机会。
Milbank Q. 2011 Sep;89(3):343-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00632.x.
6
The Third Annual US Celebration of World Hospice and Palliative Care Day: A virtual coming together to unify the global palliative care community.第三届美国世界临终关怀与姑息治疗日年度庆典:一次虚拟的全球姑息治疗社区大团聚。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Jun;21(3):378-384. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000391.
7
Patients' perceptions of palliative care quality in hospice inpatient care, hospice day care, palliative units in nursing homes, and home care: a cross-sectional study.临终关怀住院护理、临终关怀日间护理、养老院姑息治疗病房及家庭护理中患者对姑息治疗质量的认知:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 24;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0152-1.
8
The 2nd Annual US Celebration of World Hospice and Palliative Care Day: A virtual coming together to support equity in palliative care access.第二届美国世界临终关怀与姑息治疗日庆祝活动:虚拟相聚,支持姑息治疗机会均等。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Jun;20(3):307-312. doi: 10.1017/S147895152200013X.
9
Update in Hospice and Palliative Care.临终关怀和姑息治疗的最新进展。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Feb;23(2):165-170. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0500. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Participating in the personal care of a person living with a life-limiting illness in a hospice inpatient setting: the informal caregiver's perspective.参与临终关怀住院患者生活有限疾病患者的个人护理:非正式照护者的视角。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2020 Jun 2;26(5):246-257. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.5.246.

引用本文的文献

1
Motivations, acceptability and ethical considerations for interventional HIV cure research at the end of life: perspectives from long-term survivors of HIV in the United States.临终时HIV干预性治愈研究的动机、可接受性及伦理考量:来自美国HIV长期存活者的观点
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 23;26(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01253-x.
2
Palliative Care: A Primary Care Pharmacist Perspective.姑息治疗:初级保健药师视角
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Jul 13;10(4):81. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10040081.