Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性观察性病例对照研究,旨在调查全层后上盂唇撕裂和原发性盂肱关节炎患者在冠状面的肩胛骨形态差异。

A prospective observational case control study investigating the coronal plane scapular morphological differences in full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears and primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Smith Geoffrey C S

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Orthopaedics, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St George and Sutherland Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):e223-e233. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.040. Epub 2021 Dec 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a surrogate marker of the coronal plane morphology of the scapula. CSA differences between scapulae could be due to differences in glenoid inclination (GI) or the location of the most lateral part of the acromion relative to the inferior glenoid, or both. An understanding of the hierarchy of the scapular morphological changes associated with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and rotator cuff (RC) tears would allow accurate biomechanical modeling.

METHODS

A prospective observational case control study was undertaken in which the GI, "nonglenoid"-CSA, acromial vertical offset index, acromial horizontal offset index, acromial horizontal-vertical offset index, and coronal plane angulation of the acromion (CPAA-m) were measured on high-quality radiographs to compare coronal plane scapular anatomy in: (1) patients with asymptomatic atraumatic full-thickness RC tears, (2) patients with symptomatic primary GHOA, and (3) a control group with no RC tear or GHOA treated for glenohumeral instability or symptomatic labral pathology. Intraobserver reliability of the measurements was performed.

RESULTS

In the GHOA group, the GI was lower (less superiorly inclined) than the RC tear group (difference between the means: -4.8°, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-8.8°, -0.9°], P = .014) and the control group (difference between the means: -7.9°, 95% CI [-11.8°, -3.9°], P = .000); there was no difference in the acromial measurements. In the RC tear group, the nonglenoid-CSA was higher (difference between the means: 7.7°, 95% CI [3.0°, 12.3°], P = .001), the acromial vertical offset index was lower (difference between the means: -0.13, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.01], P = .026), and the acromial horizontal-vertical offset index was higher (difference between the means: 0.15, 95% CI [0.01, 0.28], P = .030) than the control group; there was no difference in the acromial horizontal offset index or the GI. The CPAA-m was lower (greater coronal plane downslope of the acromion) in both GHOA (difference between the means: -9.6°, 95% CI [-18.6°, -0.5°], P = .036) and RC tears (difference between the means: -9.9°, 95% CI [-19.0°, -0.9°], P = .029) compared with the control group. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver reliability demonstrated excellent reliability for the measurements (all >0.900).

DISCUSSION

Scapulae associated with GHOA have lower GI, but no spatial differences in the location of the lateral acromion compared with a normal population. Scapulae associated with RC tears have a lower vertical offset of the lateral acromion, but no difference in horizontal offset or GI compared with a normal population. The downslope of the acromion in the coronal plane is greater (lower CPAA-m) in both RC tears and GHOA than the normal population.

摘要

引言

临界肩角(CSA)是肩胛骨冠状面形态的替代标志物。肩胛骨之间的CSA差异可能是由于关节盂倾斜度(GI)的差异,或肩峰最外侧部分相对于关节盂下极的位置差异,或两者皆有。了解与盂肱骨关节炎(GHOA)和肩袖(RC)撕裂相关的肩胛骨形态变化的层级关系将有助于进行准确的生物力学建模。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性观察性病例对照研究,在高质量X线片上测量GI、“非关节盂”-CSA、肩峰垂直偏移指数、肩峰水平偏移指数、肩峰水平-垂直偏移指数以及肩峰的冠状面角度(CPAA-m),以比较以下三组的肩胛骨冠状面解剖结构:(1)无症状非创伤性全层RC撕裂患者,(2)有症状的原发性GHOA患者,(3)因盂肱关节不稳或有症状的盂唇病变接受治疗且无RC撕裂或GHOA的对照组。对测量的观察者内可靠性进行了评估。

结果

在GHOA组中,GI低于RC撕裂组(均值差异:-4.8°,95%置信区间[CI][-8.8°,-0.9°],P = 0.014)和对照组(均值差异:-7.9°,95% CI [-11.8°,-3.9°],P = 0.000);肩峰测量值无差异。在RC撕裂组中,非关节盂-CSA较高(均值差异:7.7°,95% CI [3.0°,12.3°],P = 0.001),肩峰垂直偏移指数较低(均值差异:-0.13,95% CI [-0.24,-0.01],P = 0.026),肩峰水平-垂直偏移指数较高(均值差异:0.15,95% CI [0.01,0.28],P = 0.030),与对照组相比;肩峰水平偏移指数或GI无差异。与对照组相比,GHOA组(均值差异:-9.6°,95% CI [-18.6°,-0.5°],P = 0.036)和RC撕裂组(均值差异:-9.9°,95% CI [-19.0°,-0.9°],P = 0.029)的CPAA-m均较低(肩峰在冠状面的下坡更大)。观察者内可靠性的组内相关系数显示测量具有出色的可靠性(均>0.900)。

讨论

与GHOA相关的肩胛骨GI较低,但与正常人群相比,肩峰外侧位置无空间差异。与RC撕裂相关的肩胛骨肩峰外侧垂直偏移较低,但与正常人群相比,水平偏移或GI无差异。在RC撕裂和GHOA中,肩峰在冠状面的下坡均比正常人群更大(CPAA-m更低)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验