Kako Shinichi, Hayakawa Fumihiko, Miyamura Koichi, Tanaka Junji, Imai Kiyotoshi, Kanda Junya, Morishima Satoko, Uchida Naoyuki, Doki Noriko, Ikegame Kazuhiro, Ozawa Yukiyasu, Takada Satoru, Usui Noriko, Ohtake Shigeki, Kiyoi Hitoshi, Matsumura Itaru, Miyazaki Yasushi, Ichinohe Tatsuo, Fukuda Takahiro, Atsuta Yoshiko, Kanda Yoshinobu
Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Japan.
Department of Cellular and Genetic Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Mar;28(3):161.e1-161.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.11.021. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
An HLA-matched relative is the first-choice donor for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). The most promising alternative donor is thought to be an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) in patients who do not have an HLA-matched related donor. Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is an alternative option. Higher rates of engraftment failure and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) are significant problems, but the ready availability of cord blood can be an advantage, because patients can immediately undergo transplantation before progression. This study was conducted to identify an appropriate alternative donor in patients with Ph-negative ALL in CR1 who do not have an HLA-matched related donor (MRD). Decision analyses using a Markov model were performed to compare immediate CBT, in which CBT was performed at 1 month after the achievement of CR1, with elective unrelated bone marrow transplantation (uBMT) from an 8/8 MUD (8/8 uBMT) or uBMT from a 7/8 MUD (7/8 uBMT), in which uBMT was performed at 4 months, in patients age 16 to 55 years with Ph-negative ALL in CR1 who did not have an MRD. We constructed a decision tree. The cycle length was set at 3 months, and analyses were performed for 19 cycles for uBMT and 20 cycles for CBT, resulting in evaluation of the 5-year life expectancy after both decisions. Transition probabilities (TPs) and utilities were estimated from prospective and retrospective Japanese studies and the registry database of Japan. Subgroup analyses were performed according to risk stratification based on WBC count and cytogenetics at diagnosis and according to age stratification, with a cutoff of 25 years. One-way sensitivity analyses for TPs and utilities were performed as well. The baseline analyses showed that 8/8 uBMT or 7/8 uBMT had superior results to CBT, with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 2.86 in 8/8 uBMT, 2.84 in 7/8 uBMT, and 2.75 in CBT. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results of the baseline analyses were reversed if the probability of NRM in CBT improved. Subgroup analyses showed similar results in younger, older, and high-risk patients. However, QALY was worse in 8/8 uBMT compared with CBT in standard-risk patients. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of NRM in uBMT and CBT affected the baseline results in all analyses except for comparisons between 8/8 uBMT and CBT in younger and high-risk patients. In these 2 populations, the superiority of 8/8 uBMT was consistently demonstrated throughout the one-way sensitivity analyses. For patients with Ph-negative ALL in CR1 who decide to undergo transplantation from an alternative donor, elective uBMT from either an 8/8 MUD or a 7/8 MUD is expected to yield a better outcome than immediate CBT. Nonetheless, CBT is a viable option, and improvements to reduce the risk of NRM in CBT may change these results.
对于处于首次完全缓解(CR1)期的费城染色体(Ph)阴性急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者,人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配的亲属是首选供者。对于没有HLA匹配的相关供者的患者,最有前景的替代供者被认为是HLA匹配的无关供者(MUD)。脐血移植(CBT)是一种替代选择。植入失败率和非复发死亡率(NRM)较高是显著问题,但脐血随时可得可能是一个优势,因为患者可在疾病进展前立即接受移植。本研究旨在为处于CR1期且没有HLA匹配的相关供者(MRD)的Ph阴性ALL患者确定合适的替代供者。使用马尔可夫模型进行决策分析,以比较在16至55岁处于CR1期且没有MRD的Ph阴性ALL患者中,在达到CR1后1个月进行的即时CBT、在4个月进行的来自8/8 MUD的择期无关骨髓移植(uBMT)(8/8 uBMT)或来自7/8 MUD的uBMT(7/8 uBMT)。我们构建了决策树。周期长度设定为3个月,对uBMT进行19个周期分析,对CBT进行20个周期分析,从而评估两种决策后的5年预期寿命。转移概率(TPs)和效用值根据日本的前瞻性和回顾性研究以及日本的登记数据库进行估计。根据诊断时的白细胞计数和细胞遗传学进行风险分层以及根据年龄分层(以25岁为界)进行亚组分析。还对TPs和效用值进行了单向敏感性分析。基线分析表明,8/8 uBMT或7/8 uBMT比CBT有更好的结果,8/8 uBMT的质量调整生命年(QALYs)为2.86,7/8 uBMT为2.84,CBT为2.75。单向敏感性分析表明,如果CBT中NRM的概率改善,基线分析结果会反转。亚组分析在年轻、年长和高危患者中显示出相似结果。然而,在低危患者中,8/8 uBMT的QALY比CBT差。在单向敏感性分析中,uBMT和CBT中的NRM概率在所有分析中均影响基线结果,但在年轻和高危患者的8/8 uBMT与CBT比较中除外。在这两个人群中,8/8 uBMT的优势在整个单向敏感性分析中始终得到证明。对于决定接受替代供者移植的处于CR1期的Ph阴性ALL患者,来自8/8 MUD或7/8 MUD的择期uBMT预计比即时CBT有更好的结果。尽管如此,CBT是一个可行的选择,降低CBT中NRM风险的改进措施可能会改变这些结果。