Suppr超能文献

无关供者脐血移植与无关供者骨髓移植治疗急性白血病的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation versus unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation in acute leukemia patients.

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 20 Chazhong Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Aug;18(8):1164-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood has emerged as an alternative stem cell source to bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells. Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is also potentially curative for acute leukemia. However, the effect of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (UBMT) and UCBT on the outcome of patients with acute leukemia has not been systematically reviewed. In the present meta-analysis, we systematically searched Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CNKI up to May 2011. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Seven studies totaling 3389 patients have been assessed. Pooled results found that the incidence of engraftment failure and transplantation-related mortality were higher in UCBT than in UBMT, and relative risks (RRs) were 4.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.94-6.21) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.01-1.59), respectively. The rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the UCBT group were significantly lower than that in the UBMT group, and RRs were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.79) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52-0.91), respectively. The relapse rate was similar between the UCBT and UBMT group. The leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly lower in the UCBT group than in the UBMT group; RRs were 1.14 (95% CI, 1.07-1.22) and hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.31 (95% CI, 1.16-1.48), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the survival was similar between UCBT and UBMT.

摘要

脐带血已成为骨髓或外周血干细胞之外的另一种干细胞来源。脐带血移植(UCBT)也可能对急性白血病有治疗作用。然而,异基因骨髓移植(UBMT)和 UCBT 对急性白血病患者结局的影响尚未进行系统评价。本研究采用系统评价方法,检索 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和中国知网(CNKI),截止日期为 2011 年 5 月。由两位评价者独立提取资料。共纳入 7 项研究,3389 例患者。合并结果显示,UCBT 组的植入失败率和移植相关死亡率高于 UBMT 组,相对危险度(RR)分别为 4.27(95%可信区间[CI]:2.94-6.21)和 1.27(95%CI:1.01-1.59)。UCBT 组急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率显著低于 UBMT 组,RR 分别为 0.71(95%CI:0.65-0.79)和 0.69(95%CI:0.52-0.91)。两组复发率相似。UCBT 组的白血病无病生存率(LFS)和总生存率(OS)显著低于 UBMT 组,RR 分别为 1.14(95%CI:1.07-1.22)和 HR 分别为 1.31(95%CI:1.16-1.48)。亚组分析显示,在急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者中,UCBT 和 UBMT 的生存情况相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验