Macken Arno A, Lans Jonathan, Miyamura Satoshi, Eberlin Kyle R, Chen Neal C
Orthopedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Dec;24(4):245-252. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00409. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
In patients with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), the soft-tissue around the elbow can be vulnerable to soft-tissue complications. This study aims to assess the outcomes after soft-tissue reconstruction following TEA.
We retrospectively included nine adult patients who underwent soft-tissue reconstruction following TEA. Demographic data and disease characteristics were collected through medical chart reviews. Additionally, we contacted all four patients that were alive at the time of the study by phone to assess any current elbow complications. Local tissue rearrangement was used for soft-tissue reconstruction in six patients, and a pedicle flap was used in three patients. The median follow-up period was 1.3 years (range, 6 months-14.7 years).
Seven patients (78%) underwent reoperation. Four patients (44%) had a reoperation for soft-tissue complications, including dehiscence or nonhealing of infected wounds. Five patients (56%) had a reoperation for implant-related complications, including three infections and two peri-prosthetic fractures. At the final follow-ups, six patients (67%) achieved successful wound healing and two patients had continued wound healing issues, while two patients had an antibiotic spacer in situ and one patient underwent an above-the-elbow amputation.
This study reports a complication rate of 78% for soft-tissue reconstructions after TEA. Successful soft-tissue healing was achieved in 67% of patients, but at the cost of multiple surgeries. Early definitive soft-tissue reconstruction could prove to be preferable to minor interventions such as irrigation, debridement, and local tissue advancement, or smaller soft-tissue reconstructions using local tissue rearrangement or a pedicled flap at a later stage.
在全肘关节置换术(TEA)患者中,肘部周围的软组织容易出现软组织并发症。本研究旨在评估TEA后软组织重建的效果。
我们回顾性纳入了9例接受TEA后软组织重建的成年患者。通过病历回顾收集人口统计学数据和疾病特征。此外,我们在研究时通过电话联系了所有4例存活患者,以评估当前肘部的任何并发症。6例患者采用局部组织重排进行软组织重建,3例患者采用带蒂皮瓣。中位随访期为1.3年(范围6个月至14.7年)。
7例患者(78%)接受了再次手术。4例患者(44%)因软组织并发症接受再次手术,包括感染伤口裂开或不愈合。5例患者(56%)因植入物相关并发症接受再次手术,包括3例感染和2例假体周围骨折。在最后一次随访时,6例患者(67%)伤口成功愈合,2例患者仍有伤口愈合问题,2例患者原位植入抗生素间隔物,1例患者接受了肘上截肢。
本研究报告TEA后软组织重建的并发症发生率为78%。67%的患者软组织愈合成功,但代价是多次手术。早期确定性软组织重建可能比诸如冲洗、清创和局部组织推进等小干预措施,或后期使用局部组织重排或带蒂皮瓣进行的较小软组织重建更可取。