Suppr超能文献

根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌患者中中度风险因素数量的意义:一项对976例患者的回顾性研究

Significance of the Number of Intermediate-Risk Factors in Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of 976 Patients.

作者信息

Zhang Jingni, Jiang Peng, Tu Yuan, Jiang Shan, Huang Yuzhen, Li Ning, Kong Wei, Yuan Rui

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 2022 May;35(5):1098-1105. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.2013578. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the impact of intermediate-risk factors (IRFs) on the prognosis of stage I-II cervical cancer (CC) patients, and evaluate the necessity of adjuvant treatment based on investigation.

METHODS

Medical records of 976 negative high-risk factors' CC patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic characteristics and adjuctive therapy were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests to identify significant factors. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

For patients with none, single and multiple IRFs, the 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 97.8%, 86.3%, and 68.0% respectively ( < 0.001), and 3-year overall survival rates were 99.3%, 93.6% and 79.0% respectively ( < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed histological type, differentiation grade, the number of IRFs and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of IRFs was demonstrated with higher predictive efficacy on survival of CC than individual IRF. Patients with multiple IRFs had significantly worse survival outcomes than patients with none or one. Different adjuvant treatment plans should be formulated based on the number of present IRFs. The prognostic management of patients with multiple IRFs should be pay more attention.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在探讨中级风险因素(IRFs)对I-II期宫颈癌(CC)患者预后的影响,并在此基础上评估辅助治疗的必要性。

方法

回顾性分析976例高危因素阴性的CC患者的病历。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验分析临床病理特征及辅助治疗,以确定显著因素。进行多因素Cox比例风险回归分析以确定独立预后因素。

结果

无、单个和多个IRF的患者,3年无复发生存率分别为97.8%、86.3%和68.0%(P<0.001),3年总生存率分别为99.3%、93.6%和79.0%(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示组织学类型、分化程度、IRF数量及辅助治疗为独立预后因素。

结论

IRF数量对CC生存的预测效能高于单个IRF。多个IRF的患者生存结局显著差于无或单个IRF的患者。应根据现有IRF数量制定不同的辅助治疗方案。对多个IRF患者的预后管理应给予更多关注。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验