Suppr超能文献

[抗胆碱能量表:在精神病学中的应用及抗胆碱能负荷量表的更新]

[Anticholinergic scales: Use in psychiatry and update of the anticholinergic impregnation scale].

作者信息

Javelot H, Meyer G, Becker G, Post G, Runge V, Pospieszynski P, Schneiderlin T, Armand-Branger S, Michel B, Weiner L, Faria C G F, Drapier D, Fakra E, Fossati P, Haffen E, Yrondi A, Hingray C

机构信息

Établissement public de santé Alsace Nord, 67170 Brumath, France; Laboratoire de toxicologie et pharmacologie neuro cardiovasculaire, université de Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg cedex, France.

Établissement public de santé Alsace Nord, 67170 Brumath, France.

出版信息

Encephale. 2022 Jun;48(3):313-324. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Dec 4.

Abstract

Anticholinergic properties are well known to prescribers, notably in mental health, as a therapeutic strategy for i.e. extrapyramidal syndrome but also as a source of numerous adverse side effects. Herein, we propose a narrative literature review describing: (i) cholinergic pharmacology and anticholinergic properties; (ii) the importance of anticholinergic therapeutic properties in psychiatry; (iii) the existing anticholinergic drug scales and their usage limitations in Psychiatry and; last (iv) an update to the anticholinergic drug impregnation scale, designed for the French psychiatry practice. The anticholinergic side effects can appear both in the peripheral level (dry mouth, constipation, etc.) and in the central level (especially as cognitive deficits). Many of the so called « anticholinergic » drugs are in fact entirely or mostly antimuscarinic and act essentially as parasympathetic system antagonists. Overall, anticholinergic/antimuscarinic side effects are usually attributed to psychotropic medications: to certain antipsychotics, notably classical neuroleptics such as phenothiazine and also to tricyclic antidepressants. In practice, the impact of anticholinergic toxicity treatments is often highlighted due to their excessively prolonged use in patients on antipsychotics. Interestingly, these antipsychotic treatments are better known for their anticholinergic side effects, especially cognitive ones, with an early onset specially in elder patients and/or in the case of polymedication. In order to evaluate anticholinergic side effects, metrics known as anticholinergic burden scales were created in the last few decades. Nowadays, 13 different scales are documented and accepted by the international academic community, but only three of them are commonly used: the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and the Anticholinergic Burden Scale (ACB). All of them are based on a similar principle, consisting of grading treatments individually, and they are normally scored from 0 - no presence of side effects - to 3 - anticholinergic effects considered to be strong or very strong. Using these scales enables the calculation of the so-called "anticholinergic burden", which corresponds to the cumulative effect of using multiple medications with anticholinergic properties simultaneously. The application of anticholinergic scales to patients with psychiatric disorders has revealed that schizophrenic patients seem to be especially sensitive to anticholinergic cognitive side effects, while elder and depressed patients were more likely to show symptoms of dementia when exposed to higher anticholinergic burden. Unfortunately, these tools appear to have a low parallel reliability, and so they might induce large differences when assessing side effects predictability. In addition, the capacity of these scales to predict central adverse effects is limited due to the fact they poorly or do not differentiate, the ability of treatments to cross the blood-brain barrier. Finally, one last limitation on the validity of these scales is prescription posology is not accounted for side effects considered to be dose dependent. Recently, the MARANTE (Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor ANTagonist Exposure) scale has incorporated an anticholinergic burden weighting by posology. Nevertheless, this new model can be criticized, due to the limited number of medications included and due to testing a limited number of potency ranges and dosages for each treatment. Herein, we propose an update to the Anticholinergic Impregnation Scale, developed specifically for the French Psychiatry practice. The scale validation was based on an evaluation of the prescriptions correcting anticholinergic peripheral side effects (constipation, xerostomia and xeropthalmia). This indirect evaluation allowed us to show patients with an anticholinergic impregnation score higher than 5 received significantly more treatments for constipation and xerostomia. This strategy bypasses the bias of a cognitive evaluation in patients with severe mental health disorders. Moreover, the relevance of a tool developed specifically for French psychiatry is justified by the fact that some highly prescribed treatments for mental illness in France (cyamemazine and tropatemine) are strong anticholinergics, and also by the fact they are rarely included in the existing anticholinergic scales. This update of the original scale, published in 2017, includes information whether prescribed drugs cross the blood-brain barrier and thus makes possible a more accurate assessment when evaluating anticholinergic central side effects. Finally, the anticholinergic impregnation scale will soon be integrated into a prescription help software, which is currently being developed to take into consideration dose dependent adverse effects.

摘要

抗胆碱能特性为开处方者所熟知,尤其是在精神健康领域,它是治疗锥体外系综合征等疾病的一种策略,但同时也是众多不良副作用的来源。在此,我们提出一篇叙述性文献综述,内容包括:(i)胆碱能药理学和抗胆碱能特性;(ii)抗胆碱能治疗特性在精神病学中的重要性;(iii)现有的抗胆碱能药物量表及其在精神病学中的使用局限性;最后(iv)针对法国精神病学实践设计的抗胆碱能药物浸渍量表的更新。抗胆碱能副作用可出现在外周水平(口干、便秘等)和中枢水平(尤其是认知缺陷)。许多所谓的“抗胆碱能”药物实际上完全或主要是抗毒蕈碱的,本质上作为副交感神经系统拮抗剂起作用。总体而言,抗胆碱能/抗毒蕈碱副作用通常归因于精神药物:某些抗精神病药物,尤其是经典抗精神病药如吩噻嗪,以及三环类抗抑郁药。在实践中,抗胆碱能毒性治疗的影响常常因其在服用抗精神病药物的患者中使用时间过长而受到关注。有趣的是,这些抗精神病治疗因其抗胆碱能副作用而更为人所知,尤其是认知方面的副作用,在老年患者中发病较早,且在多药联合使用的情况下更易出现。为了评估抗胆碱能副作用,在过去几十年中创建了称为抗胆碱能负担量表的指标。如今,有13种不同的量表已被国际学术界记录并认可,但其中只有三种常用:抗胆碱能药物量表(ADS)、抗胆碱能风险量表(ARS)和抗胆碱能负担量表(ACB)。它们都基于类似的原则,即对治疗进行单独评分,通常从0(无副作用)到3(抗胆碱能作用被认为强烈或非常强烈)进行评分。使用这些量表能够计算所谓的“抗胆碱能负担”,这相当于同时使用多种具有抗胆碱能特性药物的累积效应。将抗胆碱能量表应用于精神疾病患者后发现,精神分裂症患者似乎对抗胆碱能认知副作用特别敏感,而老年和抑郁症患者在抗胆碱能负担较高时更易出现痴呆症状。不幸的是,这些工具的平行信度似乎较低,因此在评估副作用可预测性时可能会产生较大差异。此外,由于这些量表难以区分或无法区分治疗药物穿过血脑屏障的能力,它们预测中枢不良反应的能力有限。最后,这些量表有效性的另一个局限性在于,未考虑到被认为与剂量相关的副作用的处方剂量。最近,MARANTE(毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体拮抗剂暴露)量表纳入了按剂量计算的抗胆碱能负担权重。然而,由于纳入的药物数量有限,且对每种治疗测试的效价范围和剂量数量有限,这个新模型可能会受到批评。在此,我们提出针对法国精神病学实践专门开发的抗胆碱能浸渍量表的更新。该量表的验证基于对纠正抗胆碱能外周副作用(便秘、口干症和干眼症)的处方的评估。这种间接评估使我们能够表明,抗胆碱能浸渍评分高于5的患者接受便秘和口干症治疗的次数明显更多。这种策略绕过了对严重精神健康障碍患者进行认知评估时的偏差。此外,专门为法国精神病学开发的工具的相关性还体现在以下事实上:法国一些治疗精神疾病的高处方药物(氰美马嗪和托哌胺)是强效抗胆碱能药物,而且它们很少被纳入现有的抗胆碱能量表中。2017年发布的原始量表的这次更新包括了所开药物是否穿过血脑屏障的信息,因此在评估抗胆碱能中枢副作用时能够进行更准确评估。最后,抗胆碱能浸渍量表很快将被集成到一个处方辅助软件中,该软件目前正在开发中,以考虑与剂量相关的不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验