Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 7;11(12):e052146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052146.
To explore the association between hormone therapy (HT) adherence and non-drug healthcare utilisation and healthcare costs among patients with breast cancer.
Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.
The US Medicare beneficiaries in the SEER-Medicare-linked database PARTICIPANTS: Women aged ≥ 65 with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer from 2007 through mid-2009 in the USA.
We examined the relationship between HT and adherence and outcomes of our interests.
Our study cohort's HT adherence, non-drug healthcare utilisation and healthcare costs for the first year of HT and each year, thereafter, for a total of 5 years.
6045 eligible Medicare beneficiaries that met our selection criteria were included. We found that patients who were adherent to HT were associated with lower healthcare utilisation of all kinds (inpatient (0.35 vs 0.43, p<0.001), length of study during hospitalisation (4.19 vs 4.89, p<0.01), physician office visits (25.16 vs 26.17, p<0.001)), and significant reductions in many types of medical costs and neutral total healthcare costs despite the increased pharmacy costs. Half of the total medical cost reduction came from savings in hospitalisation costs.
Our study suggests that the added cost of HT adherence was all but offset by the reduced cost for other medical care. Our study provides evidence on the potential success of implementing value-based insurance design (VBID) plans among patients with breast cancer to improve their long-term oral medication adherence. Policymakers should consider adherence improvement strategies such as VBID plans, given that the costs likely will not surpass the total savings.
探讨激素治疗(HT)依从性与乳腺癌患者非药物保健利用和医疗保健费用之间的关系。
回顾性纵向队列研究。
SEER-Medicare 关联数据库中的美国 Medicare 受益人
年龄≥65 岁、美国 2007 年至 2009 年中期激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者。
我们检查了 HT 和依从性与我们感兴趣的结果之间的关系。
我们的研究队列在 HT 的第一年和之后的每一年的 HT 依从性、非药物保健利用和医疗保健费用,共 5 年。
符合我们选择标准的 6045 名合格的 Medicare 受益人被纳入研究。我们发现,坚持 HT 的患者与各种医疗保健利用的减少有关(住院患者(0.35 比 0.43,p<0.001)、住院期间的研究时间(4.19 比 4.89,p<0.01)、医生门诊就诊次数(25.16 比 26.17,p<0.001)),并且尽管药房费用增加,但许多类型的医疗费用和中性总医疗费用显著降低。总医疗费用降低的一半来自住院费用的节省。
我们的研究表明,HT 依从性增加的成本几乎被其他医疗费用的减少所抵消。我们的研究为在乳腺癌患者中实施基于价值的保险设计(VBID)计划以提高他们长期口服药物依从性的潜在成功提供了证据。鉴于成本不太可能超过总节省,政策制定者应考虑依从性改善策略,如 VBID 计划。