Deng Wen, Chen Ru, Jiang Xian, Zheng Ping, Zhu Ke, Zhou Xiaochen, Liu Xiaoqiang, Guo Ju, Chen Luyao, Wang Gongxian, Fu Bin
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Yongwai Street 17, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, Fujian, China.
J Oncol. 2021 Nov 28;2021:9523442. doi: 10.1155/2021/9523442. eCollection 2021.
Our team had firstly applied the transvesical approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients afflicted with localized prostate cancer (PCa). The present study aims to present the postoperative recovery of urinary continence (UC) following the anterior, transvesical, and posterior approaches to RARP for localized PCa and evaluate the independent predictors to early UC recovery after RARP.
Patients harboring localized PCa and receiving anterior, transvesical, and posterior approaches to RARP between January 2017 and June 2020 were enrolled in this analysis. Results on UC recovery were compared between these three approaches with the Kaplan-Meier method. All clinical and pathological variables were further analyzed via univariable and multivariable regression analysis to determine the independent factors contributing to short-term UC recovery after RARP.
A total of 135, 73, and 66 instances were included in the anterior, transvesical, and posterior groups, respectively. Over the postoperative follow-up period, both the transvesical and posterior approaches showed an advantage over the anterior approach in promoting postoperative UC recovery (both values <0.001). Three months after surgery, 55 (40.7%), 4 (5.5%), and 5 (7.6%) patients failed to UC in the anterior, transvesical, and posterior groups, respectively. Patient age, preoperative PSA, prostate volume, biopsy Gleason score, surgical approach, extended lymph node dissection technique, nerve-sparing technique, and positive lymph node were related to UC status based on univariable analyses ( < 0.05). Multivariable analysis results point patient age, prostate volume, surgical approach, and nerve-sparing technique as independent factors that affect postoperative UC recovery after RARP.
The application of transvesical approach to RARP for localized PCa could obtain promising outcomes in terms of postoperative UC recovery. In addition, surgical strategies encompassing the nerve-sparing technique and the Retzius-sparing procedures, namely, the transvesical or posterior approach, during RARP could independently enable early achievement of postoperative continence.
我们的团队首次将经膀胱途径应用于局部前列腺癌(PCa)患者的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)。本研究旨在呈现局部PCa患者经RARP的前路、经膀胱及后路途径术后尿失禁(UC)的恢复情况,并评估RARP术后早期UC恢复的独立预测因素。
纳入2017年1月至2020年6月间接受RARP的前路、经膀胱及后路途径的局部PCa患者进行分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较这三种途径的UC恢复结果。通过单变量和多变量回归分析进一步分析所有临床和病理变量,以确定RARP术后短期UC恢复的独立因素。
前路组、经膀胱组和后路组分别纳入135例、73例和66例。在术后随访期间,经膀胱和后路途径在促进术后UC恢复方面均显示出优于前路途径的优势(均P值<0.001)。术后3个月,前路组、经膀胱组和后路组分别有55例(40.7%)、4例(5.5%)和5例(7.6%)患者未能实现UC。单变量分析显示,患者年龄、术前PSA、前列腺体积、活检Gleason评分、手术途径扩展淋巴结清扫技术、保留神经技术和阳性淋巴结与UC状态相关(P<0.05)。多变量分析结果表明,患者年龄、前列腺体积、手术途径和保留神经技术是影响RARP术后UC恢复的独立因素。
将经膀胱途径应用于局部PCa的RARP在术后UC恢复方面可取得良好效果。此外,在RARP期间采用包括保留神经技术和保留耻骨后间隙手术(即经膀胱或后路途径)的手术策略可独立实现术后早期控尿。