Comparison of cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced MDCT and T2-weighted MR imaging in the histological subtype differentiation of renal cell carcinoma: radiology-pathology correlation.

PURPOSE

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype differentiation is of crucial importance in the management and prognosis of these patients. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of unenhanced and cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities in the discrimination of the 3 main subtype RCC patients in correlation with their histopathological findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 80 pathologically proven RCC patients who had undergone either partial or total nephrectomy were retrospectively investigated in this study. Their histological subtypes were 54 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), 15 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), and 11 chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (cRCC), based on pathological evaluation. There were 62 male (77.5%) and 18 female (22.5%) patients. Among the 54 ccRCC patients, 29 patients had both non-contrast and cortico-medullary phase CT, 1 had only non-contrast CT, 5 only had cortico-medullary phase CT, and 38 had MRI examination. In the pRCC group, 10 patients had both non-contrast and cortico-medullary phase CT, 1 had only non-contrast CT, 1 had only cortico-medullary phase CT, and 12 had MRI. Finally, in the remaining 11 cRCC patients, 9 had both non-contrast and cortico-medullary phase CT, and only 5 had MRI. We calculated both tumour attenuation values as HU (Hounsfield units) on unenhanced and cortico-medullary phase MDCT images and also tumour mean signal intensity values on FSE T2-weighted MRI images by using the region of interest (ROI) including normal renal cortex measurements. Besides quantitative evaluation, we also performed qualitative visual assessment of tumours on contrast-enhanced MDCT and FSE T2-weighted MRI.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference among the attenuation values of the 3 tumour subtypes on pre-contrast CT images. ccRCC demonstrated a prominent degree of contrast enhancement compared to the chromophobe and papillary ones on cortico-medullary phase MDCT. We found no statistically significant difference between chromophobe and papillary subtypes, although chromophobe tumours showed slightly higher attenuation values compared to papillary ones. ccRCCs usually demonstrated a heterogenous contrast enhancement on cortico-medullary phase CT images, while the papillary subtype usually had a homogenous appearance on visual assessment. On FSE T2-weighted MR images, the signal intensity values of ccRCC patients were found to be significantly higher than both chromophobe and papillary subtypes. Although cRCC patients had a prominently lower T2 signal intensity than clear cell subtype, there was no statistically significant signal intensity difference between chromophobe and papillary subtypes. Regarding visual assessment, papillary subtype tumours showed a mostly homogenous appearance on T2-weighted images and a statistically significant difference was present. On the other hand, there was no significant difference of visual assessment of the clear cell and chromophobe subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of the attenuation values on cortico-medullary phase MDCT and the mean signal intensity values on FSE T2-weighted MRI can provide useful information in the differentiation of RCC main subtypes. Also, visual assessment of tumours on both modalities can contribute to this issue by providing additional imaging properties.