Brand Alexander S
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2017 Mar 27;122:1-41. doi: 10.6028/jres.122.022. eCollection 2017.
Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) is a surface topography measurement technique with reported sub-nanometer vertical resolution. Although it has been made commercially available recently, few studies have evaluated the uncertainty or noise in the phase measurement by the DHM. As current research is using the DHM to monitor surface topography changes of dissolving materials under flowing water conditions, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of water and flow rate on the uncertainty in the measurement. Uncertainty in this study was concerned with the temporal standard deviation per pixel of the reconstructed phase. Considering the effects of solution flow rate, magnification, objective lens type (air or immersion), and experimental configuration, measurements under static conditions in air and in water with an immersion lens yielded the smallest amount of uncertainty (mean of ≤ 0.5 nm up to 40× magnification). Increasing the water flow rate resulted in an increase in mean uncertainty to ≤ 0.6 nm up to 40× with an immersion lens. Observations of a sample through a glass window at 20× magnification in flowing water also yielded increasing uncertainty, with mean values of ≤ 0.5 nm, ≤ 0.8 nm, and ≤ 1.1 nm for flow rates of 0 mL min, 15 mL min, and 33 mL min. Different hologram acquisition rates (12.5 s and 25 s) did not significantly impact the uncertainty in the phase. Collecting holograms in single-wavelength versus dual-wavelength modes did impact the uncertainty, with the mean uncertainty at 10× magnification for the same wavelength being ≤ 0.5 nm from the single-wavelength mode compared to ≤ 1.5 nm from the dual-wavelength mode. When the quantified uncertainty was applied to simulated dissolution data, lower limits of measured dissolution rates were found below which the measured data may not be distinguishable from the uncertainty in the measurement. The limiting surface-normal dissolution velocity is -10 m s for experiments with an immersion lens in flowing water conditions and -10 m s, -10 m s, and -10 m s for static (0 mL min), slow (≤ 15 mL min), and fast (≤ 109 mL min) flowing water conditions in experiments with a glass window, respectively. The data presented by this study will allow for better experimental design and methodology for future dissolution or precipitation studies using DHM and will provide confidence in the data produced in postprocessing.
数字全息显微镜(DHM)是一种表面形貌测量技术,据报道其垂直分辨率可达亚纳米级。尽管该技术最近已实现商业化,但很少有研究评估DHM相位测量中的不确定度或噪声。由于当前的研究正在使用DHM来监测流动水条件下溶解材料的表面形貌变化,因此有必要评估水和流速对测量不确定度的影响。本研究中的不确定度涉及重建相位每像素的时间标准差。考虑到溶液流速、放大倍数、物镜类型(空气或浸没)和实验配置的影响,在空气中静态条件下以及使用浸没透镜在水中进行测量时,不确定度最小(放大倍数高达40倍时,平均值≤0.5纳米)。增加水流速会导致使用浸没透镜时,放大倍数高达40倍时平均不确定度增加至≤0.6纳米。在流动水中通过玻璃窗以20倍放大倍数观察样品时,不确定度也会增加,流速为0毫升/分钟、15毫升/分钟和33毫升/分钟时,平均值分别为≤0.5纳米、≤0.8纳米和≤1.1纳米。不同的全息图采集速率(12.5秒和25秒)对相位不确定度没有显著影响。在单波长与双波长模式下采集全息图确实会影响不确定度,在相同波长下,10倍放大倍数时,单波长模式下的平均不确定度≤0.5纳米,而双波长模式下为≤1.5纳米。当将量化的不确定度应用于模拟溶解数据时,发现了测量溶解速率的下限,低于该下限,测量数据可能无法与测量不确定度区分开来。在流动水条件下使用浸没透镜进行实验时,极限表面法向溶解速度为-10米/秒,而在使用玻璃窗进行实验时,静态(0毫升/分钟)、缓慢(≤15毫升/分钟)和快速(≤109毫升/分钟)流动水条件下的极限表面法向溶解速度分别为-10米/秒、-10米/秒和-10米/秒。本研究提供的数据将有助于为未来使用DHM进行溶解或沉淀研究设计更好的实验和方法,并将为后处理中产生的数据提供可信度。