Thomas William C, Zarr Robert R
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2018 Jan 8;123:1-24. doi: 10.6028/jres.123.001. eCollection 2018.
A mathematical model is presented for a new-generation guarded-hot-plate apparatus to measure the thermal conductivity of insulation materials. This apparatus will be used to provide standard reference materials for greater ranges of temperature and pressure than have been previously available. The apparatus requires precise control of 16 interacting heated components to achieve the steady temperature and one-dimensional heat-transfer conditions specified in standardized test methods. Achieving these criteria requires deriving gain settings for the 16 proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers, comprising potentially 48 parameters. Traditional tuning procedures based on trial-and-error operation of the actual apparatus impose unacceptably lengthy test times and expense. A primary objective of the present investigation is to describe and confirm the incremental control algorithm for this application and determine satisfactory gain settings using a mathematical model that simulates in seconds test runs that would require days to complete using the apparatus. The first of two steps to achieve precise temperature control is to create and validate a model that accounts for heating rates in the various components and interactions with their surroundings. The next step is to simulate dynamic performance and control with the model and determine settings for the PID controllers. A key criterion in deriving the model is to account for effects that significantly impact thermal conductivity measurements while maintaining a tractable model that meets the simulation time constraint. The mathematical model presented here demonstrates how an intricate apparatus can be represented by many interconnected aggregated-capacity masses to depict overall thermal response for control simulations. The major assemblies are the hot plate with four subcomponents, two cold plates with three subcomponents each, and two edge guards with three subcomponents each. Using symmetry about the hot plate, the number of components in the simulation model is reduced to 12 or 15, depending on the mode of operation for the apparatus. Configurations of the main components with embedded heating elements were carefully designed earlier using detailed finite-element analyses to give essentially isothermal surfaces and one-dimensional heat flow through test specimens. It is not tractable, or perhaps justified, to extend these prior analyses to simulate the controlled transient responses of the apparatus. The earlier design criterion does, however, support the aggregated-capacity simplification implemented in the present thermal model. The governing equations follow from dynamic energy balances on components with controlled heating elements and additional intermediate ("floating") components. Thermal bridges comprise conduction paths, with and without surface convection and radiation, between components and fixed-temperature "heat sinks." An implicit finite-difference numerical method was used to solve the resulting system of first-order differential equations. The mathematical model was initially validated using measurement data from test runs where a step change in heating rate was applied to single elements in turn, and component temperatures were recorded up to a nearly steady condition. Thermocouples and standard platinum resistance thermometers were used to measure temperatures, and thermopiles were used to measure temperature differences. Next, extensive simulations were conducted with the mathematical model to estimate suitable gain settings for the various controllers. The criteria were tight temperature control after reaching set points and acceptable times to achieve quasi-steady-state operation. Comparisons between measurements and predicted temperatures for heated components are presented. The results show that the model incorporating the above simplifying approximations is satisfactory for components comprising the hot-plate and cold-plate assemblies. For the edge guards, however, the conventional aggregated-capacity criteria are not as fully satisfied because of their configuration. Temperature variations in the edge guards, fortunately, have a lesser effect on the accuracy of the thermal conductivity measurements. Therefore, the thermal response model is deemed satisfactory for simulating PID feedback to investigate "closed-loop" control of the apparatus, thus meeting the primary objective.
本文提出了一种用于新一代防护热板装置的数学模型,该装置用于测量绝缘材料的热导率。该装置将用于提供比以往更大温度和压力范围的标准参考材料。该装置需要精确控制16个相互作用的加热部件,以实现标准化测试方法中规定的稳定温度和一维传热条件。要达到这些标准,需要为16个比例积分微分(PID)控制器推导增益设置,这可能涉及48个参数。基于实际装置反复试验操作的传统调谐程序会导致测试时间过长且成本过高,令人无法接受。本研究的一个主要目标是描述并验证适用于此应用的增量控制算法,并使用数学模型确定令人满意的增益设置,该模型能在数秒内模拟出使用实际装置需要数天才能完成的测试运行。实现精确温度控制的两个步骤中的第一步是创建并验证一个模型,该模型要考虑各个部件的加热速率以及它们与周围环境的相互作用。下一步是使用该模型模拟动态性能并进行控制,然后确定PID控制器的设置。推导该模型的一个关键标准是,在保持一个易于处理且满足模拟时间限制的模型的同时,要考虑对热导率测量有显著影响的各种效应。这里提出的数学模型展示了一个复杂的装置如何能用许多相互连接的集总容量质量块来表示,以描述用于控制模拟的整体热响应。主要组件包括带有四个子组件的热板、两个各带有三个子组件的冷板以及两个各带有三个子组件的边缘防护装置。利用热板的对称性,根据装置的运行模式,模拟模型中的组件数量可减少到12个或15个。带有嵌入式加热元件的主要组件的配置 earlier 使用详细的有限元分析进行了精心设计,以给出基本等温的表面和通过测试样品的一维热流。将这些先前的分析扩展到模拟装置的受控瞬态响应既不易处理,也可能不合理。然而,早期的设计标准确实支持了本热模型中采用的集总容量简化方法。控制方程源自对带有受控加热元件的组件以及额外的中间(“浮动”)组件的动态能量平衡。热桥包括组件与固定温度“散热器”之间的传导路径,这些路径存在或不存在表面对流和辐射。使用隐式有限差分数值方法来求解由此产生的一阶微分方程组。该数学模型最初使用测试运行的测量数据进行了验证,在测试运行中,依次对单个元件的加热速率进行阶跃变化,并记录组件温度直至接近稳定状态。使用热电偶和标准铂电阻温度计测量温度,使用热电堆测量温度差。接下来,使用该数学模型进行了广泛的模拟,以估计各种控制器的合适增益设置。标准是达到设定点后严格的温度控制以及达到准稳态运行的可接受时间。给出了加热组件的测量温度与预测温度之间的比较。结果表明,包含上述简化近似的模型对于组成热板和冷板组件的部件是令人满意的。然而,对于边缘防护装置,由于其配置,传统的集总容量标准并未得到充分满足。幸运的是,边缘防护装置中的温度变化对热导率测量精度的影响较小。因此,热响应模型被认为对于模拟PID反馈以研究装置的“闭环”控制是令人满意的,从而实现了主要目标。