Suppr超能文献

印度“平价药品计划”中的通用抗癌药物及其品牌对应药物:首次成本比较研究

Generic Anticancer Drugs of the Jan Aushadhi Scheme in India and Their Branded Counterparts: The First Cost Comparison Study.

作者信息

George Thomas, Baliga Manjeshwar S

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Coney Island Hospital, Brooklyn, USA.

Research, Mangalore Institute of Oncology, Mangalore, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Nov 3;13(11):e19231. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19231. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In India, the costs of cancer drugs are exorbitant and cause significant financial toxicity to the affected patient and their family members. Considering this, Jan Aushadhi pharmacy stores were established across the country by the government of India with the objective of providing cheap generic medicines to patients. The objective of this study was to perform a cost comparison study of generic chemotherapeutic drugs provided through Jan Aushadhi pharmacies versus their branded counterparts. This will help patients and physicians get first-hand information on the cost variation between generic and branded anticancer drugs in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cost of Jan Aushadhi generic drugs and the cost of the most expensive and cheapest marketed branded drugs for the same molecule and dose were ascertained and presented in both Indian Rupees (INR) and US Dollars (as of July 2021). Finally, the difference in costs in INR, cost ratio, and cost variance were calculated, comparing the price of the Jan Aushadhi generic drugs with the most expensive and the cheapest branded drug in the same category.

RESULTS

Compared to branded drugs, all the Jan Ausadhi generic drugs were cheaper, except one (methotrexate). The highest cost difference was observed for docetaxel, while the least was observed for methotrexate tablets (2.5 mg). The highest cost ratio (22.24) and cost variance (3327.56) were observed for doxorubicin injection (50 mg).

CONCLUSION

The current study compares the cost difference between the marketed branded and Jan Aushadhi generic anticancer drugs for the first time. Replacing the costly branded anticancer drugs with Jan Aushadhi generic drugs can result in substantial cost savings. The information obtained from this cost difference analysis will be helpful for the healthcare fraternity, patients, policymakers, and society at large.

摘要

引言

在印度,抗癌药物费用高昂,给患者及其家属带来了巨大的经济负担。鉴于此,印度政府在全国设立了平价药房,旨在为患者提供廉价的仿制药。本研究的目的是对通过平价药房提供的仿制药与品牌抗癌药物进行成本比较研究。这将有助于患者和医生直接了解印度仿制药和品牌抗癌药物之间的成本差异。

材料与方法

确定了平价药房仿制药的成本以及相同分子和剂量的市场上最昂贵和最便宜的品牌药物的成本,并以印度卢比(INR)和美元(截至2021年7月)呈现。最后,计算了印度卢比的成本差异、成本比率和成本方差,将平价药房仿制药的价格与同一类中最昂贵和最便宜的品牌药物进行比较。

结果

与品牌药物相比,除一种药物(甲氨蝶呤)外,所有平价药房的仿制药都更便宜。多西他赛的成本差异最高,而甲氨蝶呤片(2.5毫克)的成本差异最小。阿霉素注射液(50毫克)的成本比率最高(22.24),成本方差最大(3327.56)。

结论

本研究首次比较了市场上品牌抗癌药物和平价药房仿制药之间的成本差异。用平价药房的仿制药替代昂贵的品牌抗癌药物可大幅节省成本。从这种成本差异分析中获得的信息将有助于医疗界、患者、政策制定者和整个社会。

相似文献

2
A Cost Analysis of the Jan Aushadhi Scheme in India.印度平价药品供应计划的成本分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):253-256. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.02.
10
Why the Jan Aushadhi Scheme Has Lost Its Steam in India?为什么印度的平价药品计划失去了动力?
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):134-136. doi: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_38_17.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic perspective of cancer treatment in India.印度癌症治疗的经济学视角。
Med Oncol. 2020 Oct 15;37(11):101. doi: 10.1007/s12032-020-01424-3.
5
Generic drugs - The Indian scenario.仿制药——印度的情况。
J Postgrad Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;65(2):67-69. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_420_18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验