• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Generic Anticancer Drugs of the Jan Aushadhi Scheme in India and Their Branded Counterparts: The First Cost Comparison Study.印度“平价药品计划”中的通用抗癌药物及其品牌对应药物:首次成本比较研究
Cureus. 2021 Nov 3;13(11):e19231. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19231. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
A Cost Analysis of the Jan Aushadhi Scheme in India.印度平价药品供应计划的成本分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):253-256. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.02.
3
Cost analysis of anticancer chemotherapy and chemoirradiation regimens considering the drugs marketed through Jan Aushadhi (People's Medicine) stores and their branded counterparts: First cost comparison study.考虑到通过 Jan Aushadhi(人民医药商店)销售的药物及其品牌药物,对癌症化疗和放化疗方案进行成本分析:首次成本比较研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Jul 1;20(5):1472-1485. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2387_22. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Pharmacoeconomic Appraisal of Treating Head and Neck Cancer with Various Chemotherapy and Chemoirradiation Regimens Using Branded and Jan-aushadhi Drugs in India.印度使用品牌药和廉价药品,采用各种化疗及放化疗方案治疗头颈癌的药物经济学评估
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1782-1791. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03753-x. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
5
A study on the price variability of branded medicines and Jan aushadi versions of selected commonly prescribed psychiatric medications in India using a cost-comparative approach and a passive evaluation of the Jan aushadhi scheme in India.一项关于印度品牌药品以及部分常用处方精神科药物的简·奥萨迪版本价格变异性的研究,采用成本比较方法以及对印度简·奥萨迪计划的被动评估。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 May;13(5):2054-2059. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1737_23. Epub 2024 May 24.
6
Cost analysis of various branded versus generic chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of early breast cancer- a deep insight from India.各种品牌与通用型化疗药物治疗早期乳腺癌的成本分析——来自印度的深入观察。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug;20(4):355-361. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1637735. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
7
Perceived Utility of Jan Aushadhi Outlets and Awareness of Generic Medicines at the Andaman and Nicobar Islands: A Cross-Sectional Study.安达曼和尼科巴群岛民众对简·奥萨迪药房的认知度及对仿制药的了解:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Apr 4;16(4):e57630. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57630. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Health economics and effectiveness analysis of generic anti-diabetic medication from jan aushadhi: An ambispective study in community pharmacy.从 Jan Aushadhi 看仿制药的卫生经济学和有效性分析:社区药房的双向研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):102303. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102303. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
9
A Cost Variation Analysis of Drugs Available in the Indian Market for the Management of Thromboembolic Disorders.印度市场上用于治疗血栓栓塞性疾病的药物成本差异分析
Cureus. 2020 May 5;12(5):e7964. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7964.
10
Why the Jan Aushadhi Scheme Has Lost Its Steam in India?为什么印度的平价药品计划失去了动力?
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):134-136. doi: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_38_17.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Treating Gynecological Cancer with Different Regimens Using the Cheapest and Costliest Brand of Drugs Marketed in India.使用印度市场上最便宜和最昂贵品牌药物的不同方案治疗妇科癌症的药物经济学分析
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Dec;74(6):489-497. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01905-1. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
2
An Analysis of Cost Variation Among Drugs Available in the Indian Market for the Treatment of Chronic Bone-Related Ailments.印度市场上治疗慢性骨相关疾病的可用药物成本差异分析。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 22;16(10):e72092. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72092. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Pharmacoeconomic Appraisal of Treating Head and Neck Cancer with Various Chemotherapy and Chemoirradiation Regimens Using Branded and Jan-aushadhi Drugs in India.印度使用品牌药和廉价药品,采用各种化疗及放化疗方案治疗头颈癌的药物经济学评估
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1782-1791. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03753-x. Epub 2023 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic perspective of cancer treatment in India.印度癌症治疗的经济学视角。
Med Oncol. 2020 Oct 15;37(11):101. doi: 10.1007/s12032-020-01424-3.
2
A Cost Variation Analysis of Drugs Available in the Indian Market for the Management of Thromboembolic Disorders.印度市场上用于治疗血栓栓塞性疾病的药物成本差异分析
Cureus. 2020 May 5;12(5):e7964. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7964.
3
The impact of tumor board on cancer care: evidence from an umbrella review.肿瘤委员会对癌症治疗的影响:来自伞式评价的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4930-3.
4
Cost analysis of various branded versus generic chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of early breast cancer- a deep insight from India.各种品牌与通用型化疗药物治疗早期乳腺癌的成本分析——来自印度的深入观察。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug;20(4):355-361. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1637735. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
Generic drugs - The Indian scenario.仿制药——印度的情况。
J Postgrad Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;65(2):67-69. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_420_18.
6
Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.系统评价新型药物在直肠癌放化疗增敏中的应用
Br J Surg. 2018 Nov;105(12):1553-1572. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10993.
7
The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016.印度各邦癌症负担及其变化:1990-2016 年全球疾病负担研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1289-1306. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30447-9. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Financial toxicity and implications for cancer care in the era of molecular and immune therapies.分子和免疫治疗时代的经济毒性及其对癌症治疗的影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 May;6(9):166. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.28.
9
A cost analysis of the psychotropic medicines sold in the jan aushadhi generic drug stores in India.印度平价药品通用药店所售精神药物的成本分析。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Mar;33:40-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Economic burden of cancer in India: Evidence from cross-sectional nationally representative household survey, 2014.印度癌症的经济负担:基于 2014 年全国代表性家庭横断面调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 26;13(2):e0193320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193320. eCollection 2018.

印度“平价药品计划”中的通用抗癌药物及其品牌对应药物:首次成本比较研究

Generic Anticancer Drugs of the Jan Aushadhi Scheme in India and Their Branded Counterparts: The First Cost Comparison Study.

作者信息

George Thomas, Baliga Manjeshwar S

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Coney Island Hospital, Brooklyn, USA.

Research, Mangalore Institute of Oncology, Mangalore, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Nov 3;13(11):e19231. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19231. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.19231
PMID:34877208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8642137/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In India, the costs of cancer drugs are exorbitant and cause significant financial toxicity to the affected patient and their family members. Considering this, Jan Aushadhi pharmacy stores were established across the country by the government of India with the objective of providing cheap generic medicines to patients. The objective of this study was to perform a cost comparison study of generic chemotherapeutic drugs provided through Jan Aushadhi pharmacies versus their branded counterparts. This will help patients and physicians get first-hand information on the cost variation between generic and branded anticancer drugs in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cost of Jan Aushadhi generic drugs and the cost of the most expensive and cheapest marketed branded drugs for the same molecule and dose were ascertained and presented in both Indian Rupees (INR) and US Dollars (as of July 2021). Finally, the difference in costs in INR, cost ratio, and cost variance were calculated, comparing the price of the Jan Aushadhi generic drugs with the most expensive and the cheapest branded drug in the same category.

RESULTS

Compared to branded drugs, all the Jan Ausadhi generic drugs were cheaper, except one (methotrexate). The highest cost difference was observed for docetaxel, while the least was observed for methotrexate tablets (2.5 mg). The highest cost ratio (22.24) and cost variance (3327.56) were observed for doxorubicin injection (50 mg).

CONCLUSION

The current study compares the cost difference between the marketed branded and Jan Aushadhi generic anticancer drugs for the first time. Replacing the costly branded anticancer drugs with Jan Aushadhi generic drugs can result in substantial cost savings. The information obtained from this cost difference analysis will be helpful for the healthcare fraternity, patients, policymakers, and society at large.

摘要

引言

在印度,抗癌药物费用高昂,给患者及其家属带来了巨大的经济负担。鉴于此,印度政府在全国设立了平价药房,旨在为患者提供廉价的仿制药。本研究的目的是对通过平价药房提供的仿制药与品牌抗癌药物进行成本比较研究。这将有助于患者和医生直接了解印度仿制药和品牌抗癌药物之间的成本差异。

材料与方法

确定了平价药房仿制药的成本以及相同分子和剂量的市场上最昂贵和最便宜的品牌药物的成本,并以印度卢比(INR)和美元(截至2021年7月)呈现。最后,计算了印度卢比的成本差异、成本比率和成本方差,将平价药房仿制药的价格与同一类中最昂贵和最便宜的品牌药物进行比较。

结果

与品牌药物相比,除一种药物(甲氨蝶呤)外,所有平价药房的仿制药都更便宜。多西他赛的成本差异最高,而甲氨蝶呤片(2.5毫克)的成本差异最小。阿霉素注射液(50毫克)的成本比率最高(22.24),成本方差最大(3327.56)。

结论

本研究首次比较了市场上品牌抗癌药物和平价药房仿制药之间的成本差异。用平价药房的仿制药替代昂贵的品牌抗癌药物可大幅节省成本。从这种成本差异分析中获得的信息将有助于医疗界、患者、政策制定者和整个社会。