Suppr超能文献

三级转诊医院二线快速反应激活的结果:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Outcomes of second-tier rapid response activations in a tertiary referral hospital: A prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 2021 Nov;50(11):838-847. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021238.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A second-tier rapid response team (RRT) is activated for patients who do not respond to first-tier measures. The premise of a tiered response is that first-tier responses by a ward team may identify and correct early states of deterioration or establish goals of care, thereby reducing unnecessary escalation of care to the RRT. Currently, utilisation and outcomes of tiered RRTs remain poorly described.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required RRT activations was conducted from February 2018 to December 2019.

RESULTS

There were 951 consecutive RRT activations from 869 patients and 76.0% patients had a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) ≥5 at the time of RRT activation. The majority (79.8%) of patients required RRT interventions that included endotracheal intubation (12.7%), point-of-care ultrasound (17.0%), discussing goals of care (14.7%) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (24.2%). Approximately 1 in 3 (36.6%) patients died during hospitalisation or within 30 days of RRT activation. In multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years, NEWS ≥7, ICU admission, longer hospitalisation days at RRT activation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores ≥3 (OR [odds ratio] 2.24, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.45-3.46), metastatic cancer (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.71-4.08) and haematological cancer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.84-4.19) were independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Critical care interventions and escalation of care are common with second-tier RRTs. This supports the need for dedicated teams with specialised critical care services. Poor functional status, metastatic and haematological cancer are significantly associated with mortality, independent of age, NEWS and ICU admission. These factors should be considered during triage and goals of care discussion.

摘要

简介

为对一线措施无反应的患者启动二线快速反应团队(RRT)。分层反应的前提是,病房团队的一线反应可以识别和纠正早期恶化状态或确定照护目标,从而减少对 RRT 不必要的护理升级。目前,分层 RRT 的利用和结果仍描述不足。

方法

对 2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 12 月期间需要 RRT 激活的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)进行了前瞻性观察研究。

结果

共有 869 例患者中的 951 例连续发生 RRT 激活,76.0%的患者在 RRT 激活时的国家早期预警评分(NEWS)≥5。大多数(79.8%)患者需要 RRT 干预,包括气管插管(12.7%)、床边超声(17.0%)、讨论照护目标(14.7%)和 ICU 入院(24.2%)。大约 1/3(36.6%)的患者在住院期间或 RRT 激活后 30 天内死亡。多变量分析显示,年龄≥65 岁、NEWS≥7、ICU 入院、RRT 激活时住院天数较长、东部合作肿瘤组表现评分≥3(OR [比值比] 2.24,95%置信区间 [置信区间] 1.45-3.46)、转移性癌症(OR 2.64,95%CI 1.71-4.08)和血液学癌症(OR 2.78,95%CI 1.84-4.19)与死亡率独立相关。

结论

二线 RRT 常见的是需要进行重症监护干预和护理升级。这支持需要有专门的团队提供专门的重症监护服务。较差的功能状态、转移性和血液学癌症与死亡率显著相关,与年龄、NEWS 和 ICU 入院无关。在分诊和讨论照护目标时应考虑这些因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验