Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Departamento de Métodos e Técnicas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;44(1):57-60. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2021-2088.
Although the Dimensional Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DY-BOCS) is a widely used instrument for assessing different obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions, its factor structure has never been studied in a Brazilian population. Thus, we aimed to assess the goodness-of-fit indexes and factor loadings of two higher-order models of the DY-BOCS using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in a large obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) sample.
We tested two CFA models in a sample of 955 adults with OCD who had been assessed with the DY-BOCS in a cross-sectional multi-site study. The first model encompassed the symptom checklist (present or absent), whereas the second focused on items related to severity scores.
Both models presented adequate goodness-of-fit indexes. The comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis index, and omega were > 0.9, while the root mean square error of approximation was ≤ 0.06 for both models. Factor loadings for each item of each dimension are presented and discussed.
Higher-order factor models showed adequate goodness-of-fit indexes, indicating that they appropriately measured OCD dimensions in this Brazilian population.
尽管耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(DY-BOCS)是一种广泛用于评估不同强迫症症状维度的工具,但它的因子结构从未在巴西人群中进行过研究。因此,我们旨在使用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估两个更高阶的 DY-BOCS 模型在大型强迫症(OCD)样本中的拟合优度指数和因子负荷。
我们在一项横断面多地点研究中,对 955 名患有 OCD 的成年人进行了 DY-BOCS 评估,在该样本中测试了两个 CFA 模型。第一个模型包括症状清单(存在或不存在),而第二个模型则侧重于与严重程度评分相关的项目。
两个模型均表现出较好的拟合优度指数。比较拟合指数、塔克-刘易斯指数和 ω均>0.9,而两个模型的近似均方根误差均≤0.06。每个维度的每个项目的因子负荷均有呈现并进行了讨论。
高阶因子模型表现出较好的拟合优度指数,表明它们在巴西人群中适当地测量了 OCD 维度。