Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Pkwy S, Room 1B25, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway S, Rm 510, Building 1, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:729-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.052. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
Several case reports suggest that penetrating thoracic cage fractures are an important cause for hemopericardium and cardiac tamponade following blunt trauma. However, the prevalence of this mechanism of injury is not fully known, and considering this association may provide a better understanding of the utility of cardiac component of the FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma).
To determine the association of thoracic cage fractures and pericardial effusion in patients with blunt trauma.
We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2015-2017) of adults ≥18 years of age whose mechanism of injury was either a fall or motor vehicle accident. Thoracic cage fractures were defined as any rib or sternum fracture. The primary outcome was the presence of pericardial effusion. Confounding variables were accounted for using multivariable logistic regression.
We included 1,673,704 patients in the study; 226,896 (14%) patients had at least one thoracic cage fracture. A pericardial effusion was present in 4923 (0.3%) patients. When a thoracic cage fracture was present, the odds of having a pericardial effusion was significantly higher (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 6.5 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]). Patients with left and right-sided rib fractures had similar odds of a pericardial effusion (aOR 1.2 [95% CI 1.04-1.4]). Sternal fractures carried the highest odds of having a pericardial effusion (aOR 11.1 [9.9-12.3]).
Thoracic cage fractures secondary to blunt trauma represent a significant independent risk factor for the development of a pericardial effusion. Our findings lend support for the mechanism of bony injuries causing penetrating cardiac trauma. Given these findings, and the fact that many thoracic cage fractures are detected after the initial evaluation, we support maintaining the cardiac view in the FAST examination for all blunt trauma patients.
一些病例报告表明,穿透性胸廓骨折是钝性创伤后血心包和心脏压塞的重要原因。然而,这种损伤机制的患病率尚不完全清楚,考虑到这种关联可以更好地理解 FAST(创伤超声重点评估)中心脏成分的作用。
确定钝性创伤患者胸廓骨折与心包积液之间的关系。
我们使用创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)数据库(2015-2017 年)进行了一项回顾性、多中心队列研究,纳入年龄≥18 岁的成年患者,其损伤机制为跌倒或机动车事故。胸廓骨折定义为任何肋骨或胸骨骨折。主要结局为心包积液的存在。使用多变量逻辑回归校正混杂变量。
我们纳入了 1673704 例患者;226896 例(14%)患者至少有一处胸廓骨折。4923 例(0.3%)患者存在心包积液。当存在胸廓骨折时,发生心包积液的几率明显更高(校正比值比[aOR] 6.5 [95%CI:6.1-7.0])。左侧和右侧肋骨骨折的患者发生心包积液的几率相似(aOR 1.2 [95%CI 1.04-1.4])。胸骨骨折发生心包积液的几率最高(aOR 11.1 [9.9-12.3])。
钝性创伤引起的胸廓骨折是心包积液发生的显著独立危险因素。我们的研究结果支持了骨损伤导致穿透性心脏创伤的机制。鉴于这些发现,以及许多胸廓骨折在初始评估后才被发现的事实,我们支持对所有钝性创伤患者在 FAST 检查中保留心脏检查。