Li Danni, Li Guanghe, He Yuning, Zhao Yingshuang, Miao Qiuci, Zhang Hao, Yuan Ying, Zhang Dayi
School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China; National Engineering Laboratory for Site Remediation Technologies, Beijing 100015, PR China.
Research Institute for Environmental Innovation (Tsinghua-Suzhou), Suzhou 215163, PR China.
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Feb 15;424(Pt B):127532. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127532. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
Linking chromium (Cr) speciation with its stability in soils is vital because insoluble Cr(VI) and chemically adsorbed Cr(VI) could hinder the remediation efficiency and release Cr(VI) for a prolonged period of time. In this study, we investigated key Cr species to probe the mechanisms controlling the release of insoluble Cr(VI) at Cr-contaminated sites using synchrotron-based X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) for the first time. Chromite, stichtite and Cr-silicate were predominant forms of Cr(III). Insoluble Cr(VI) was hosted by layered double hydroxides (LDHs) such as brownmilerite and hydrotalcite. Anion competition tests documented a substitution of absorbed Cr(VI) by SO and NO. Acid extraction released 6.7-25.7% more Cr(VI) than anion extraction, possibly attributing to the erosion of LDH and CaCrO in calcite rather than Cr-bearing minerals. Brown and red soils released maximally 62% and 44% of total Cr(VI) by 10 mol/(kg soil) and 2 mol/(kg soil) of H, respectively. SO, HO and H contributed to more release of total Cr(VI) in brown soils (22%, 33% and 7%) than red soils (25%, 17% and 2%). More crystalline Cr structures were found after chemical stabilization, indicating a higher Cr stability in chemically stabilized soils. Cr and Mn exhibited an overlapped distribution pattern in both contaminated and chemically stabilized soils, hinting at the re-oxidation of Cr(III). Insoluble Cr(VI) could be released by acidic rainfalls and soil organic matters, posing potential threats to Cr long-term stability in field-scale remediation.
将铬(Cr)的形态与其在土壤中的稳定性联系起来至关重要,因为不溶性Cr(VI)和化学吸附的Cr(VI)可能会阻碍修复效率,并在很长一段时间内释放Cr(VI)。在本研究中,我们首次使用基于同步加速器的X射线吸收近边结构(XANES)研究了关键的Cr形态,以探究控制Cr污染场地中不溶性Cr(VI)释放的机制。铬铁矿、水铬镁矿和Cr-硅酸盐是Cr(III)的主要形态。不溶性Cr(VI)由层状双氢氧化物(LDH)承载,如钙铁榴石和水滑石。阴离子竞争试验记录了SO和NO对吸附的Cr(VI)的取代。酸提取比阴离子提取释放的Cr(VI)多6.7-25.7%,这可能归因于方解石中LDH和CaCrO的侵蚀,而不是含Cr矿物。棕壤和红壤分别通过10 mol/(kg土壤)和2 mol/(kg土壤)的H最大释放了62%和44%的总Cr(VI)。SO、HO和H对棕壤中总Cr(VI)的释放贡献(分别为22%、33%和7%)比红壤(分别为25%、17%和2%)更多。化学稳定后发现更多结晶态的Cr结构,表明化学稳定土壤中Cr的稳定性更高。在污染土壤和化学稳定土壤中,Cr和Mn都呈现出重叠的分布模式,这暗示了Cr(III)的再氧化。不溶性Cr(VI)可能会因酸雨和土壤有机质而释放,这对田间规模修复中Cr的长期稳定性构成潜在威胁。