Mukhtar Irum, Chen Ruanni, Cheng Yunying, Chen Jianming
Minjiang University, 26465, Institute of Oceanography, Minhou district, Fuzhou, China, 350108;
Minjiang University, 26465, Fuzhou, Fujian, China;
Plant Dis. 2021 Dec 8. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2154-PDN.
Astragalus sinicus L., (Chinese milk vetch) is a traditional leguminous green manure that plays a significant role in maintaining paddy soil fertility to enhance yield and the quality of rice in China. It is also found in gardens, roadsides, farms, fields, riverbanks, open wastelands, and is often used as livestock feed. From February 2019 to 2021, severe powdery mildew infections were observed on hundreds of A. sinicus grown in gardens and at roadsides of Fuzhou city, China. The disease incidence was up to 100% on leaves and stems of A. sinicus. White superficial fungal colonies (circular to irregular patches) were present on both sides of the leaves. Hyphae were flexuous to straight, branched, 4 to 8 µm in width, and septate. Hyphal appressoria were lobulate and solitary or in opposite pairs. Conidiophores were erect and straight, hyaline, and 60 to 120 × 8 to 10 µm (n=30). Foot cell was cylindrical, straight to slightly curved, 22 to 38 × 8 to 10 µm, followed by two to three shorter cells. Conidia were cylindrical-oval to doliiform, 30 to 48 × 13.5 to 24 μm with a length/width ratio of 1.6 to 2.4 (n = 30), formed singly, and without fibrosin bodies. Conidial germ tubes were produced subterminal position. No chasmothecia were found in the collected samples. The morphological characteristics of asexual structures were consistent with the descriptions of E. trifoliorum (Wallr.) U. Braun in Braun and Cook (2012). To verify the identification of the pathogen, the ITS and the part of large subunit (LSU) rDNA gene of the isolates were amplified using ITS1/ITS4 and LSU1/ LSU2 primers (Scholin et al. 1994 and White et al. 1990, respectively) and sequences were deposited in GenBank (ITS: MZ021332, MZ021333; LSU: MZ021334, MZ021335). In BLASTn searches, the ITS and LSU sequences were 99 to 100% identical with those of E. trifoliorum parasitic on Lathyrus magellanicus (LC010015), Medicago littoralis (LC270860), Melilotus officinalis (LC009924) and Trifolium spp., (MN216308, KY660821), as well as E. baeumleri (Bradshaw et al. 2021) on Vicia nigricans (LC010014). Pathogenicity test was performed by gently pressing a diseased leaf onto 10 young leaves of three healthy potted plants, while three non-inoculated plants were used as controls. All plants were maintained in a greenhouse at 20 to 25°C, without humidity control, and natural light. Symptoms developed 7 days after inoculation, whereas the control leaves remained symptomless. The morphology of the fungus on the inoculated leaves was identical to that observed on the originally diseased leaves. Powdery mildew on A. sinicus has been reported as E. pisi and E. polygoni from Korea and China (Shin, 2000; Tai 1979), respectively. Amano (1986) listed E. pisi and Microsphaera astragali (now E. astragali) on A. sinicus from China and Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first report of powdery mildew caused by E. trifoliorum on A. sinicus in China and in general. E. astragali is the most common and widespread powdery mildew species on Astragalus spp. (Braun and Cook 2012) and would be expected on A. sinicus, but this species is genetically clearly different from E. trifoliorum (Bradshaw et al. 2021). The E. trifoliorum complex (clade) is composed of several morphologically well-distinguishable species, besides E. trifoliorum also including E. baeumleri (on Vicia spp.), E. hyperici (on Hypericum spp.), and E. euonymi (on Euonymus spp.), but based on a combination of sequence plus host identity, the collection on A. sinicus can be assigned to E. trifoliorum (Bradshaw et al. 2021). The information in this study extended the host range of E. trifoliorum as well as future studies on A. sinicus in relation to powdery mildew outbreaks in China. References: Amano (Hirata), K. 1986. Host Range and Geographical Distribution of the Powdery Mildew Fungi. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, 741 pp. Bradshaw, M., et al. 2021. Mycologia. (In press) Braun, U., Cook, R. T. A. 2012. Taxonomic Manual of the Erysiphales (Powdery Mildews), CBS Biodiversity Series No. 11. CBS, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Scholin, C. A., et al. 1994. J. Phycol. 30:999. Shin, H.D. 2000. Erysiphaceae of Korea. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea, 320 pp. Tai, F.L. 1979. Sylloge Fungorum Sinicorum. Sci. Press, Acad. Sin., Peking, 1527 pp. White, T. J., et al. 1990. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
紫云英是一种传统的豆科绿肥,在中国维持稻田土壤肥力以提高水稻产量和品质方面发挥着重要作用。它也生长在花园、路边、农场、田野、河岸、开阔荒地,常被用作牲畜饲料。2019年2月至2021年期间,在中国福州市的花园和路边种植的数百株紫云英上观察到严重的白粉病感染。紫云英叶片和茎上的发病率高达100%。叶片两面均出现白色表面真菌菌落(圆形至不规则斑块)。菌丝弯曲至直,有分枝,宽4至8μm,有隔膜。菌丝附着胞呈叶状,单个或成对相对。分生孢子梗直立且直,无色透明,60至120×8至10μm(n = 30)。基部细胞呈圆柱形,直或略弯曲,22至38×8至10μm,其后是两到三个较短的细胞。分生孢子圆柱形至椭圆形或倒卵形,30至48×13.5至24μm,长宽比为1.6至2.4(n = 30),单个形成,无纤维状物质。分生孢子芽管在近末端位置产生。在采集的样本中未发现闭囊壳。无性结构的形态特征与Braun和Cook(2012年)中对三叶草白粉菌(E. trifoliorum (Wallr.) U. Braun)的描述一致。为了验证病原菌的鉴定,使用ITS1/ITS4和LSU1/ LSU2引物(分别为Scholin等人,1994年和White等人,1990年)扩增分离株的ITS和部分大亚基(LSU)rDNA基因,并将序列存入GenBank(ITS:MZ021332,MZ021333;LSU:MZ021334,MZ021335)。在BLASTn搜索中,ITS和LSU序列与寄生在大花豆(Lathyrus magellanicus)(LC010015)、海滨苜蓿(Medicago littoralis)(LC270860)、黄香草木犀(Melilotus officinalis)(LC009924)和三叶草属(Trifolium spp.)(MN216308,KY660821)上的三叶草白粉菌以及寄生在黑野豌豆(Vicia nigricans)(LC010014)上的鲍氏白粉菌(E. baeumleri)(Bradshaw等人,2021年)的序列有99%至100%的同一性。通过将一片病叶轻轻按压在三株健康盆栽植物的10片幼叶上进行致病性测试,同时将三株未接种的植物作为对照。所有植物都保存在20至25°C的温室中,不控制湿度,采用自然光。接种7天后出现症状,而对照叶片仍无症状。接种叶片上真菌的形态与最初患病叶片上观察到的相同。韩国和中国分别报道过紫云英上的豌豆白粉菌(E. pisi)和蓼白粉菌(E. polygoni)(Shin,2000年;戴芳澜,1979年)。天野(1986年)列出了中国和日本紫云英上的豌豆白粉菌和紫云英白粉菌(现为黄芪白粉菌(E. astragali))。据我们所知,这是中国乃至全球首次关于三叶草白粉菌引起紫云英白粉病的报道。黄芪白粉菌是黄芪属植物上最常见和分布最广的白粉菌物种(Braun和Cook,2012年),预计也会出现在紫云英上,但该物种在基因上与三叶草白粉菌明显不同(Bradshaw等人,2021年)。三叶草白粉菌复合体(分支)由几个形态上易于区分的物种组成,除了三叶草白粉菌外,还包括鲍氏白粉菌(寄生在野豌豆属植物上)、金丝桃白粉菌(寄生在金丝桃属植物上)和卫矛白粉菌(寄生在卫矛属植物上),但根据序列加寄主同一性的组合,紫云英上的分离物可归为三叶草白粉菌(Bradshaw等人,2021年)。本研究中的信息扩展了三叶草白粉菌的寄主范围,以及未来中国关于紫云英白粉病爆发的研究。参考文献:天野(平田),K. 1986. 白粉菌的寄主范围和地理分布。日本科学协会出版社,东京,741页。Bradshaw,M.等人,2021. 《真菌学》(即将出版)。Braun,U.,Cook,R. T. A. 2012. 《白粉菌目分类手册》(白粉菌)第一卷,CBS生物多样性系列第11号。CBS,荷兰乌得勒支。Scholin,C. A.等人,1994. 《藻类学杂志》30:999。Shin,H.D. 2000. 《韩国白粉菌科》。韩国国立农业科学技术研究所,水原,韩国,320页。戴芳澜,1979. 《中国真菌总汇》。科学出版社,中国科学院,北京,1527页。White,T. J.等人,1990. 《PCR实验指南:方法与应用》第315页。学术出版社,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥。