Suppr超能文献

双侧输卵管卵巢切除术与全因和死因特异性死亡率的关联:基于人群的队列研究。

Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with all cause and cause specific mortality: population based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2021 Dec 8;375:e067528. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067528.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, compared with ovarian conservation, is associated with all cause or cause specific death in women undergoing hysterectomy for non-malignant disease, and to determine how this association varies with age at surgery.

DESIGN

Population based cohort study.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2015, and follow-up to 31 December 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

200 549 women (aged 30-70 years) undergoing non-malignant hysterectomy, stratified into premenopausal (<45 years), menopausal transition (45-49 years), early menopausal (50-54 years), and late menopausal (≥55 years) groups according to age at surgery; median follow-up was 12 years (interquartile range 7-17).

EXPOSURES

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy versus ovarian conservation.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The primary outcome was all cause death. Secondary outcomes were non-cancer and cancer death. Within each age group, overlap propensity score weighted survival models were used to examine the association between bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and mortality outcomes, while adjusting for demographic characteristics, gynaecological conditions, and comorbidities. To account for comparisons in four age groups, P<0.0125 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 19%, 41%, 69%, and 81% of women aged <45, 45-49, 50-54, and ≥55 years, respectively. The procedure was associated with increased rates of all cause death in women aged <45 years (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.45, P<0.001; number needed to harm 71 at 20 years) and 45-49 years (1.16, 1.04 to 1.30, P=0.007; 152 at 20 years), but not in women aged 50-54 years (0.83, 0.72 to 0.97, P=0.018) or ≥55 years (0.92, 0.82 to 1.03, P=0.16). Findings in women aged <50 years were driven largely by increased non-cancer death. In secondary analyses identifying a possible change in the association between bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and all cause death with advancing age at surgery, the hazard ratio gradually decreased during the menopausal transition and remained around 1 at all ages thereafter.

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at non-malignant hysterectomy appeared to be associated with increased all cause mortality in women aged <50 years, but not in those aged ≥50 years. While caution is warranted when considering bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in premenopausal women without indication, this strategy for ovarian cancer risk reduction does not appear to be detrimental to survival in postmenopausal women.

摘要

目的

确定对于因非恶性疾病行子宫切除术的女性,与卵巢保留相比,双侧输卵管卵巢切除术是否与全因或特定原因死亡相关,并确定这种相关性如何随手术时的年龄而变化。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

地点

加拿大安大略省,1996 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,随访至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。

参与者

200549 名年龄在 30-70 岁之间的女性(<45 岁为绝经前期,45-49 岁为绝经过渡前期,50-54 岁为早绝经前期,≥55 岁为晚绝经后期),根据手术时的年龄分为四组:接受非恶性子宫切除术;中位随访时间为 12 年(四分位距 7-17 年)。

暴露

双侧输卵管卵巢切除术与卵巢保留。

主要结局指标

主要结局为全因死亡。次要结局为非癌症和癌症死亡。在每个年龄组内,重叠倾向评分加权生存模型用于检查双侧输卵管卵巢切除术与死亡率结局之间的关联,同时调整人口统计学特征、妇科状况和合并症。为了比较四个年龄组,P<0.0125 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

<45 岁、45-49 岁、50-54 岁和≥55 岁的女性中,分别有 19%、41%、69%和 81%的女性接受了双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。该手术与<45 岁女性(危险比 1.31,95%置信区间 1.18-1.45,P<0.001;20 年时需要治疗的人数为 71)和 45-49 岁女性(1.16,1.04-1.30,P=0.007;20 年时需要治疗的人数为 152)的全因死亡率增加相关,但与 50-54 岁(0.83,0.72-0.97,P=0.018)或≥55 岁(0.92,0.82-1.03,P=0.16)的女性无关。<50 岁女性的研究结果主要是由非癌症死亡率增加所致。在确定双侧输卵管卵巢切除术与全因死亡之间关联随手术年龄变化的可能变化的次要分析中,危险比在绝经过渡前期逐渐下降,此后在所有年龄组均保持在 1 左右。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,对于因非恶性疾病行子宫切除术的女性,与保留卵巢相比,双侧输卵管卵巢切除术似乎与<50 岁女性的全因死亡率增加相关,但与≥50 岁女性无关。虽然在没有指征的情况下对绝经前女性考虑行双侧输卵管卵巢切除术时需要谨慎,但这种降低卵巢癌风险的策略似乎不会对绝经后女性的生存造成损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39bb/8653240/55a4f3ce0ce8/cusm067528.f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验