Suppr超能文献

子宫切除加双侧输卵管卵巢切除的子宫内膜异位症切除手术与单纯子宫内膜异位症切除手术治疗深部子宫内膜异位症相关盆腔疼痛的比较

Excisional endometriosis surgery with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy versus excisional endometriosis surgery alone for pelvic pain associated with deep endometriosis.

作者信息

Manobharath N, Lewin J, Hirsch M, Naftalin J, Vashisht A, Cutner A, Saridogan E

出版信息

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):35-43. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.1.055.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no agreed consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for pain associated with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare improvement in symptoms and quality-of-life in patients undergoing excisional endometriosis surgery (EES) versus EES with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (EES-HBSO).

METHODS

This study evaluated patients undergoing EES and EES-HBSO at a single endometriosis centre between 2009 and 2019. Data was obtained from the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy database. Adenomyosis was assessed by blinded re-analysis of imaging and/or histology data.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain scores (numeric rating scale 0-10) and quality-of-life scores (EQ-VAS) before and after EES and EES-HBSO.

RESULTS

We included 120 patients undergoing EES and 100 patients undergoing EES-HBSO. After controlling for baseline characteristics and the presence of adenomyosis, there was greater post-op improvement in non-cyclical pelvic pain amongst patients undergoing EES-HBSO compared to EES alone.The baseline pain scores had improved in the EES-HBSO cohort by 2.106/10 at 6 months (95%CI 0.469-3.742, p=0.012), 2.642/10 at 12 months (95%CI 0.871-4.413, p=0.004), and 2.548/10 at 24 months (95%CI 0.681-4.414, p=0.008), when compared to the EES group. Greater improvement amongst EES-HBSO patients was also seen for dyspareunia, non-cyclical dyschaezia and bladder pain. Patients undergoing EES-HBSO had greater improvement in EQ-VAS, although this was no longer statistically significant after controlling for adenomyosis.

CONCLUSION

EES-HBSO appears to provide greater benefit than EES alone for symptoms including non-cyclical pelvic pain as well as for quality-of-life. Further research is required to determine which patients benefit the most from EES-HBSO, and whether removal of the ovaries, uterus or both is the key to this additional benefit in symptom control.

摘要

背景

对于子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的最佳手术治疗方法,目前尚无公认的共识。

目的

比较接受子宫内膜异位症切除术(EES)与接受EES联合子宫切除术及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(EES-HBSO)的患者在症状和生活质量方面的改善情况。

方法

本研究评估了2009年至2019年间在单一子宫内膜异位症中心接受EES和EES-HBSO的患者。数据来自英国妇科内镜学会数据库。通过对影像学和/或组织学数据进行盲法重新分析来评估子宫腺肌病。

主要观察指标

EES和EES-HBSO前后的疼痛评分(数字评分量表0-10)和生活质量评分(EQ-VAS)。

结果

我们纳入了120例接受EES的患者和100例接受EES-HBSO的患者。在控制了基线特征和子宫腺肌病的存在后,与单纯EES相比,接受EES-HBSO的患者术后非周期性盆腔疼痛的改善更大。与EES组相比,EES-HBSO队列在6个月时基线疼痛评分改善了2.106/10(95%CI 0.469-3.742,p=0.012),在12个月时改善了2.642/10(95%CI 0.871-4.413,p=0.004),在24个月时改善了2.548/10(95%CI 0.681-4.414,p=0.008)。EES-HBSO患者在性交困难、非周期性排便困难和膀胱疼痛方面也有更大改善。接受EES-HBSO的患者在EQ-VAS方面有更大改善,尽管在控制子宫腺肌病后这不再具有统计学意义。

结论

对于包括非周期性盆腔疼痛在内的症状以及生活质量,EES-HBSO似乎比单纯EES更有益。需要进一步研究以确定哪些患者从EES-HBSO中获益最大,以及切除卵巢、子宫或两者是否是症状控制中这种额外获益的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验