Manobharath N, Lewin J, Hirsch M, Naftalin J, Vashisht A, Cutner A, Saridogan E
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):35-43. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.1.055.
There is no agreed consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for pain associated with endometriosis.
To compare improvement in symptoms and quality-of-life in patients undergoing excisional endometriosis surgery (EES) versus EES with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (EES-HBSO).
This study evaluated patients undergoing EES and EES-HBSO at a single endometriosis centre between 2009 and 2019. Data was obtained from the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy database. Adenomyosis was assessed by blinded re-analysis of imaging and/or histology data.
Pain scores (numeric rating scale 0-10) and quality-of-life scores (EQ-VAS) before and after EES and EES-HBSO.
We included 120 patients undergoing EES and 100 patients undergoing EES-HBSO. After controlling for baseline characteristics and the presence of adenomyosis, there was greater post-op improvement in non-cyclical pelvic pain amongst patients undergoing EES-HBSO compared to EES alone.The baseline pain scores had improved in the EES-HBSO cohort by 2.106/10 at 6 months (95%CI 0.469-3.742, p=0.012), 2.642/10 at 12 months (95%CI 0.871-4.413, p=0.004), and 2.548/10 at 24 months (95%CI 0.681-4.414, p=0.008), when compared to the EES group. Greater improvement amongst EES-HBSO patients was also seen for dyspareunia, non-cyclical dyschaezia and bladder pain. Patients undergoing EES-HBSO had greater improvement in EQ-VAS, although this was no longer statistically significant after controlling for adenomyosis.
EES-HBSO appears to provide greater benefit than EES alone for symptoms including non-cyclical pelvic pain as well as for quality-of-life. Further research is required to determine which patients benefit the most from EES-HBSO, and whether removal of the ovaries, uterus or both is the key to this additional benefit in symptom control.
对于子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的最佳手术治疗方法,目前尚无公认的共识。
比较接受子宫内膜异位症切除术(EES)与接受EES联合子宫切除术及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(EES-HBSO)的患者在症状和生活质量方面的改善情况。
本研究评估了2009年至2019年间在单一子宫内膜异位症中心接受EES和EES-HBSO的患者。数据来自英国妇科内镜学会数据库。通过对影像学和/或组织学数据进行盲法重新分析来评估子宫腺肌病。
EES和EES-HBSO前后的疼痛评分(数字评分量表0-10)和生活质量评分(EQ-VAS)。
我们纳入了120例接受EES的患者和100例接受EES-HBSO的患者。在控制了基线特征和子宫腺肌病的存在后,与单纯EES相比,接受EES-HBSO的患者术后非周期性盆腔疼痛的改善更大。与EES组相比,EES-HBSO队列在6个月时基线疼痛评分改善了2.106/10(95%CI 0.469-3.742,p=0.012),在12个月时改善了2.642/10(95%CI 0.871-4.413,p=0.004),在24个月时改善了2.548/10(95%CI 0.681-4.414,p=0.008)。EES-HBSO患者在性交困难、非周期性排便困难和膀胱疼痛方面也有更大改善。接受EES-HBSO的患者在EQ-VAS方面有更大改善,尽管在控制子宫腺肌病后这不再具有统计学意义。
对于包括非周期性盆腔疼痛在内的症状以及生活质量,EES-HBSO似乎比单纯EES更有益。需要进一步研究以确定哪些患者从EES-HBSO中获益最大,以及切除卵巢、子宫或两者是否是症状控制中这种额外获益的关键。