Suppr超能文献

负压伤口治疗在四肢内固定术后骨折相关感染中的应用:一项系统综述。

The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review.

作者信息

Jensen Niels Martin, Steenstrup Signe, Ravn Christen, Schmal Hagen, Viberg Bjarke

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Sygehusvej 22, 6000, Kolding, Denmark.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Nov 17;24:101710. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101710. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review the current literature on studies using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or dressings following fracture-related infection (FRI) in internal osteosynthesis of the extremity. Articles were analyzed on fracture and wound healing and included when comparing or describing the use of either NPWT or dressings in FRI. We conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases: Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The studies were screened by two authors using Covidence.org and evaluated for risk of bias. A total of 8576 records were identified. No articles compared NPWT to dressings. Seven case reports and three case series included a total of 115 patients treated for FRI. Fracture healing was achieved in 21 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT (4 amputations and 46 not described) and all 48 patients in the dressing group (4 patients needed additional sequestrectomy procedures). Five studies did not describe fracture healing. In 57 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT, the wounds were described as healed, closed, or requiring soft tissue reconstruction (4 amputations and six lacking description). The dressing group had complete wound coverage in 18 patients and partial coverage in 30 patients. Studies were generally at high risk of bias because of insufficient descriptions of both patient demographics and outcomes. No studies compared NPWT to dressings, and the existing literature is at high risk of bias. The included studies were of low-level evidence. NPWT can be neither recommended nor advised against to cover infected osteosynthesis.

摘要

本研究旨在系统回顾当前关于在四肢内固定术后骨折相关感染(FRI)中使用负压伤口治疗(NPWT)或敷料的文献。分析了有关骨折和伤口愈合的文章,纳入了比较或描述NPWT或敷料在FRI中使用情况的文章。我们在四个电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索:Embase、Medline、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus。由两位作者使用Covidence.org对研究进行筛选,并评估偏倚风险。共识别出8576条记录。没有文章将NPWT与敷料进行比较。七篇病例报告和三篇病例系列共纳入了115例接受FRI治疗的患者。接受NPWT治疗的67例患者中有21例实现了骨折愈合(4例截肢,46例未描述),敷料组的48例患者均实现了骨折愈合(4例患者需要额外的死骨切除术)。五项研究未描述骨折愈合情况。接受NPWT治疗的67例患者中有57例伤口被描述为愈合、闭合或需要软组织重建(4例截肢,6例缺乏描述)。敷料组18例患者伤口完全覆盖,30例患者部分覆盖。由于患者人口统计学和结局的描述不足,研究普遍存在高偏倚风险。没有研究将NPWT与敷料进行比较,现有文献存在高偏倚风险。纳入的研究证据级别较低。对于覆盖感染的内固定,既不推荐也不反对使用NPWT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验