Suppr超能文献

种族和民族对固体肿瘤患者使用下一代测序的趋势,在医疗保险国家覆盖范围确定实施后的变化。

Trends in Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Solid Tumors by Race and Ethnicity After Implementation of the Medicare National Coverage Determination.

机构信息

Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California.

Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38219.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In March 2018, Medicare issued a national coverage determination (NCD) for next-generation sequencing (NGS) to facilitate access to NGS testing among Medicare beneficiaries. It is unknown whether the NCD affected health equity issues for Medicare beneficiaries and the overall population.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the Medicare NCD and NGS use by insurance types and race and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using electronic health record data derived from a real-world database. Data originated from approximately 280 cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care) in the US. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), or advanced melanoma diagnosed from January 1, 2011, through March 31, 2020, were included.

EXPOSURE

Pre- vs post-NCD period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patients were classified by insurance type and race and ethnicity to examine patterns in NGS testing less than or equal to 60 days after diagnosis. Difference-in-differences models examined changes in average NGS testing in the pre- and post-NCD periods by race and ethnicity, and interrupted time-series analysis examined whether trends over time varied by insurance type and race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Among 92 687 patients with aNSCLC, mCRC, mBC, or advanced melanoma, mean (SD) age was 66.6 (11.2) years, 51 582 (55.7%) were women, and 63 864 (68.9%) were Medicare beneficiaries. The largest racial and ethnic categories according to the database used and further classification were Black or African American (8605 [9.3%]) and non-Hispanic White (59 806 [64.5%]). Compared with Medicare beneficiaries, changes in pre- to post-NCD NGS testing trends were similar in commercially insured patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.08; P = .25). Pre- to post-NCD NGS testing trends increased at a slower rate among patients in assistance programs (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; P = .03) compared with Medicare beneficiaries. The rate of increase for patients receiving Medicaid was not statistically significantly different compared with those receiving Medicare (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.01; P = .07). The NCD was not associated with statistically significant changes in NGS use trends by racial and ethnic groups within Medicare beneficiaries alone or across all insurance types. Compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, increases in average NGS use from the pre-NCD to post-NCD period were 14% lower (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99; P = .04) among African American and 23% lower (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96; P = .02) among Hispanic/Latino individuals; increases among Asian individuals and those with other races and ethnicities were similar.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that expansion of Medicare-covered benefits may not occur equally across insurance types, thereby further widening or maintaining disparities in NGS testing. Additional efforts beyond coverage policies are needed to ensure equitable access to the benefits of precision medicine.

摘要

重要性:2018 年 3 月,医疗保险发布了下一代测序(NGS)的国家覆盖范围决定(NCD),以促进医疗保险受益人的 NGS 检测。尚不清楚该 NCD 是否会影响医疗保险受益人和整个人群的健康公平问题。

目的:研究医疗保险 NCD 与保险类型和种族及民族的 NGS 使用之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:使用来自美国大约 280 家癌症诊所(约 800 个治疗地点)的真实世界数据库中的电子健康记录数据进行回顾性队列分析。患者患有晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)、转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)、转移性乳腺癌(mBC)或晚期黑色素瘤,诊断时间为 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日。

暴露:NCD 前后时期。

主要结果和措施:根据保险类型和种族及民族对患者进行分类,以检查诊断后≤60 天内 NGS 检测的模式。差异中的差异模型检查了 NCD 前后时期按种族和民族划分的平均 NGS 检测的变化,中断时间序列分析检查了趋势是否随保险类型和种族和民族而变化。

结果:在 92687 名患有 aNSCLC、mCRC、mBC 或晚期黑色素瘤的患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 66.6(11.2)岁,51582 名(55.7%)为女性,63864 名(68.9%)为医疗保险受益人。根据使用的数据库和进一步分类,最大的种族和民族类别为黑种人或非裔美国人(8605 [9.3%])和非西班牙裔白人(59806 [64.5%])。与医疗保险受益人相比,商业保险患者中 NGS 检测趋势的 NCD 前后变化相似(比值比[OR],1.03;95%置信区间[CI],0.98-1.08;P=0.25)。与医疗保险受益人相比,援助计划中的患者 NGS 检测趋势的增加速度较慢(OR,0.93;95%CI,0.87-0.99;P=0.03)。与接受医疗保险的患者相比,接受医疗补助的患者的增长率没有统计学意义上的显著差异(OR,0.92;95%CI,0.84-1.01;P=0.07)。NCD 与医疗保险受益人群内或所有保险类型中按种族和民族划分的 NGS 使用趋势的统计学显著变化无关。与非西班牙裔白人相比,非裔美国人的平均 NGS 使用量从 NCD 前到 NCD 后增加了 14%(OR,0.86;95%CI,0.74-0.99;P=0.04),西班牙裔/拉丁裔增加了 23%(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.62-0.96;P=0.02);亚洲人和其他种族和民族的增长情况相似。

结论和相关性:这项研究的结果表明,医疗保险覆盖范围的扩大可能不会在保险类型之间平等发生,从而进一步扩大或维持 NGS 检测的差异。除了覆盖政策之外,还需要做出额外的努力,以确保公平获得精准医学的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a3/8662372/674bb6c06e93/jamanetwopen-e2138219-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Association Between Medicare's National Coverage Determination and Utilization of Next-Generation Sequencing.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1774-e1784. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01023. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Trends and Disparities in Next-Generation Sequencing in Metastatic Prostate and Urothelial Cancers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2423186. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23186.
5
COVID-19 Hospitalization in Hawai'i and Patterns of Insurance Coverage, Race and Ethnicity, and Vaccination.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e243696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3696.
6
Medicare Eligibility and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Operative Fixation for Distal Radius Fracture.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2349621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49621.
8
Enrollment in Supplemental Insurance Coverage Among Medicare Beneficiaries by Race/Ethnicity.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Oct;9(5):2001-2010. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01138-w. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of Novel Hormonal Therapy Agents in Patients With Prostate Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2345906. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45906.

引用本文的文献

4
Claim Denials for Cancer-Related Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicare.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255785. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5785.
5
Adoption of Broad Genomic Profiling in Patients With Cancer.
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0499.
6
Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Apr 14;10(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02161-7.
7
Disparities in Next-Generation Genetic Sequencing Among Individuals with Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):650-652. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16464-6. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
8
Existing Health Inequities in the Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Cancers.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1553-1562. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01617-3. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
9
Barriers and facilitators to next-generation sequencing use in United States oncology settings: a systematic review.
Future Oncol. 2024;20(35):2765-2777. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2390821. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

2
ALK Testing Trends and Patterns Among Community Practices in the United States.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00159.
3
Association Between Medicare's National Coverage Determination and Utilization of Next-Generation Sequencing.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1774-e1784. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01023. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
Validation analysis of a composite real-world mortality endpoint for patients with cancer in the United States.
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13669. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
The Effect of Advances in Lung-Cancer Treatment on Population Mortality.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 13;383(7):640-649. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916623.
7
8
Value of Precision Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes Associated with the Use of Companion Diagnostics.
Oncologist. 2020 Nov;25(11):e1743-e1752. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0864. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
9
Insights From a Temporal Assessment of Increases in US Private Payer Coverage of Tumor Sequencing From 2015 to 2019.
Value Health. 2020 May;23(5):551-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Utilization of tumor genomics in clinical practice: an international survey among ASCO members.
Future Oncol. 2019 Jul;15(21):2463-2470. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0010. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验