Kang So-Yeon, Odouard Ilina, Gresenz Carole Roan
Department of Health Management and Policy, Georgetown University School of Health, Washington, DC.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255785. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5785.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented a National Coverage Determination (NCD) for genetic testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in March 2018 and amended it in January 2020. Little is known about how often NGS insurance claims are denied and what factors are associated with these denials.
To examine the prevalence of and factors associated with claim denials for NGS testing among Medicare enrollees.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a 20% random sample of Medicare claims data from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Statistical analysis took place from June to October 2024.
Claim denials were measured based on payment and denial data. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated with patient and claim characteristics, including testing type, testing site, and time period indicators reflecting the presence and scope of the NCD: no NCD (period 1), first NCD (period 2), and amended NCD (period 3).
The study sample included 29 919 cancer-related NGS claims among 24 443 unique Medicare beneficiaries (51.8% males; 44.7% aged >75 years). The number of cancer-related NGS testing claims increased from 1912 in 2016 to 9177 in 2021. Claim denial occurred among 23.3% of the NGS claims in the sample. The claim denial rate was 16.8% before the NCD, 20.3% after the implementation of the NCD in 2018, and 27.4% after the amended NCD in 2020. Claims for NGS testing were more likely to be denied if they were performed in independent laboratories (odds ratio [OR], 2.76 [95% CI, 2.58-2.95]; P < .001) or other nonhospital sites (OR, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.12-3.07]; P < .001) vs a hospital or if they were for 50 or more genes vs 50 or fewer genes for solid tumors (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.23-1.43]; P < .001). The likelihood of a claim denial was higher in both time periods after the original 2018 NCD compared with before the NCD (period 2: OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.10-1.36]; P < .001; period 3: OR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.49-1.80]; P < .001). The claim denial likelihood for period 3 was significantly higher than period 2 (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.24-1.44]; P < .001).
In this cohort study of cancer-related NGS testing claims among Medicare enrollees, denial rates varied by testing type and testing site and increased over time. The findings suggest the continued existence of uncertainty regarding coverage for NGS, despite the NCD. Policy approaches to further reduce uncertainty regarding NGS coverage and raise awareness of potential financial liability warrant consideration.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心于2018年3月实施了一项关于使用下一代测序(NGS)进行基因检测的全国覆盖范围判定(NCD),并于2020年1月对其进行了修订。对于NGS保险理赔被拒的频率以及与这些拒赔相关的因素,人们知之甚少。
研究医疗保险参保人中NGS检测理赔被拒的发生率及相关因素。
设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日医疗保险理赔数据的20%随机样本。统计分析于2024年6月至10月进行。
根据支付和拒赔数据衡量理赔被拒情况。使用患者和理赔特征估计多变量逻辑回归模型,包括检测类型、检测地点以及反映NCD存在和范围的时间段指标:无NCD(第1阶段)、首个NCD(第2阶段)和修订后的NCD(第3阶段)。
研究样本包括24443名独特医疗保险受益人中的29919份与癌症相关的NGS理赔(男性占51.8%;年龄>75岁的占44.7%)。与癌症相关的NGS检测理赔数量从2016年的1912份增加到2021年的9177份。样本中23.3%的NGS理赔发生了拒赔。在NCD实施前,拒赔率为16.8%,2018年NCD实施后为20.3%,2020年修订后的NCD实施后为27.4%。如果NGS检测在独立实验室(优势比[OR],2.76[95%CI,2.58 - 2.95];P < .001)或其他非医院场所(OR,2.55[95%CI,2.12 - 3.07];P < .001)进行,而不是在医院进行,或者如果是针对实体瘤检测50个或更多基因而非50个或更少基因(OR,1.32[95%CI,1.23 - 1.43];P < .001),则NGS检测理赔更有可能被拒。与NCD实施前相比,2018年最初的NCD之后的两个时间段内理赔被拒的可能性更高(第2阶段:OR,1.23[95%CI,1.10 - 1.36];P < .001;第3阶段:OR,1.64[95%CI,1.49 - 1.80];P < .001)。第3阶段的理赔被拒可能性显著高于第2阶段(OR,1.34[95%CI,1.24 - 1.44];P < .001)。
在这项针对医疗保险参保人中与癌症相关的NGS检测理赔的队列研究中,拒赔率因检测类型和检测地点而异,且随时间增加。研究结果表明,尽管有NCD,但NGS覆盖范围仍存在不确定性。进一步减少NGS覆盖范围不确定性并提高对潜在财务责任认识的政策方法值得考虑。