Health and Function Study Nucleus, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Medicine and Human Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Acupunct Med. 2022 Apr;40(2):178-185. doi: 10.1177/09645284211057560. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
INTRODUCTION: There is evidence that electroacupuncture (EA) acts through the modulation of brain activity, but little is known about its influence on corticospinal excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of EA parameters on the excitability of M1 in healthy individuals. METHODS: A parallel, double blind, randomized controlled trial in healthy subjects, evaluating the influence of an EA intervention on M1 excitability. Participants had a needle inserted at LI4 in the dominant hand and received electrical stimulation of different frequencies (10 or 100 Hz) and amplitude (sensory or motor threshold) for 20 min. In the control group, only a brief (30 s) electrical stimulation was applied. Single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electromyography was applied before and immediately after the EA intervention. Resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential, short intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation were measured. RESULTS: EA increased corticospinal excitability of M1 compared to the control group only when administered with a frequency of 100 Hz at the sensory threshold ( < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the other measures. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that EA with an intensity level at the sensorial threshold and 100 Hz frequency increases the corticospinal excitability of M1. This effect may be associated with a decrease in the activity of inhibitory intracortical mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: U1111-1173-1946 (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos; http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/).
简介:有证据表明,电针(EA)通过调节大脑活动起作用,但对于其对初级运动皮层(M1)皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响知之甚少。 目的:研究 EA 参数对健康个体 M1 兴奋性的影响。 方法:一项平行、双盲、随机对照试验,评估 EA 干预对 M1 兴奋性的影响。参与者将手的 LI4 插入一根针,并接受不同频率(10 或 100 Hz)和幅度(感觉或运动阈值)的电刺激 20 分钟。在对照组中,仅进行短暂的(30 秒)电刺激。在 EA 干预之前和之后立即应用单脉冲和双脉冲经颅磁刺激结合肌电图。测量静息运动阈值、运动诱发电位、短程皮质内抑制和皮质内易化。 结果:与对照组相比,只有在感觉阈值(<0.05)下以 100 Hz 的频率给予 EA 时,M1 的皮质脊髓兴奋性才会增加。其他测量值没有明显变化。 结论:结果表明,在感觉阈值和 100 Hz 频率下进行的 EA 会增加 M1 的皮质脊髓兴奋性。这种效应可能与抑制性皮质内机制活性的降低有关。 试验注册号:U1111-1173-1946(巴西临床试验注册处;http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/)。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017-10
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019-2-12