Furlong Mairead, Mulligan Christine, McGarr Sharon, O'Connor Siobhan, McGilloway Sinead
Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 23;12:783161. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.783161. eCollection 2021.
Parental mental illness (PMI) is common and can lead to children developing mental disorders. Family Talk (FT) is a well-known and widely implemented intervention designed to reduce the risk of transgenerational psychopathology. However, given the research to practise "gap," very little qualitative research, to date, has investigated practitioner experiences in implementing FT. This study aimed to explore the practitioner-perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation and sustainability of FT within mainstream mental health settings. This qualitative study was nested within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Family Talk [ = 86 families (139 parents, 221 children)] within 15 adult (AMHS), child (CAMHS), primary care mental health, and child protection sites in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were undertaken with a purposive sample of clinicians ( = 31) and managers ( = 10), based on their experiences of implementing FT. Interview data were transcribed verbatim, analysed using constructivist grounded theory, and informed by Fixsen's implementation science framework. Service providers highlighted a number of benefits for approximately two thirds of families across different diagnoses and mental health settings (AMHS/CAMHS/primary care). Sites varied in their capacity to embed FT, with key enablers identified as acquiring managerial and organisational support, building clinician skill, and establishing interagency collaboration. Implementation challenges included: recruitment difficulties, stresses in working with multiply-disadvantaged families, disruption in delivery due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, and sustainability concerns (e.g., perceived fit of FT with organisational remit/capacity, systemic and cultural barriers to change). This study is only the second qualitative study ever conducted to explore practitioner experiences in implementing FT, and the first conducted within the context of an RCT and national research programme to introduce family-focused practise (FFP) for families living with PMI. The findings illuminate the successes and complexities of implementing FFP in a country without a "think family" infrastructure, whilst highlighting a number of important generalisable lessons for the implementation of FT, and other similar interventions, elsewhere.
父母精神疾病(PMI)很常见,可能导致孩子患上精神障碍。家庭谈话(FT)是一种广为人知且广泛实施的干预措施,旨在降低跨代精神病理学的风险。然而,鉴于研究与实践之间存在“差距”,迄今为止,很少有定性研究调查从业者在实施FT方面的经验。本研究旨在探讨从业者所感知到的在主流心理健康环境中实施FT及其可持续性的障碍和促进因素。这项定性研究嵌套在爱尔兰15个成人(AMHS)、儿童(CAMHS)、初级保健心理健康和儿童保护场所进行的一项家庭谈话随机对照试验(RCT)[ = 86个家庭(139名父母,221名儿童)]中。基于他们实施FT的经验,对一组有目的抽样的临床医生( = 31)和管理人员( = 10)进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。访谈数据逐字转录,使用建构主义扎根理论进行分析,并以Fixsen的实施科学框架为依据。服务提供者强调,对于不同诊断和心理健康环境(AMHS/CAMHS/初级保健)中约三分之二的家庭而言,FT有诸多益处。各场所嵌入FT的能力各不相同,确定的关键促成因素包括获得管理和组织支持、培养临床医生技能以及建立跨机构合作。实施方面的挑战包括:招募困难、与多重弱势家庭合作时的压力、由于新冠疫情全球大流行导致的服务中断以及可持续性问题(例如,认为FT与组织职责/能力的契合度、变革的系统和文化障碍)。本研究是有史以来第二项探索从业者实施FT经验的定性研究,也是第一项在RCT和国家研究计划背景下进行的研究,该计划旨在为患有PMI的家庭引入以家庭为中心的实践(FFP)。研究结果阐明了在一个没有“家庭思维”基础设施的国家实施FFP的成功与复杂性,同时突出了一些对在其他地方实施FT及其他类似干预措施具有重要普遍意义的经验教训。