Leadbeater Bonnie, Sukhawathanakul Paweena, Rush Jonathan, Merrin Gabriel, Lewis Nathan
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, P. O. Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Prev Sci. 2022 May;23(4):538-551. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01327-3. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
This study has two objectives: (1) to report the results of a large-scale, longitudinal evaluation of the WITS Programs that included a large sample of elementary school children (n = 1967) from 27 rural schools (including 16 program schools) and (2) to examine and discuss the effects of average developmental trajectories and of heterogeneity in children's development on intervention outcomes. Data comprise baseline (spring) and four follow-up assessments (5 Waves) from children (N = 1967) and their parents and teachers. WITS stands for Walk away Ignore, Talk it out, and Seek Help ( www.witsprograms.com ). The children in the intervention schools declined more slowly than those in the control schools in their reports of relational victimization. Children in the intervention schools also declined faster in aggression and emotional problems relative to children in control schools. Moderation analyses showed that intervention group children with higher baseline levels of emotional problems declined faster in emotional problems than those with lower problems at baseline. In addition, children in grades 3 and over completed school climate questionnaire and children in control schools who had more negative perceptions of school climate at baseline showed greater increases in these negative perceptions compared to children in the intervention schools. We discuss the potential impact of average trajectories of child development and the within-child heterogeneity in assessments for the interpretation of the findings. We also conclude by highlighting evaluation design modifications that may improve our future ability to examine the effects of preventive interventions for elementary school children.
(1)报告对WITS项目进行的大规模纵向评估结果,该评估纳入了来自27所农村学校(包括16所项目学校)的大量小学生样本(n = 1967);(2)检验并讨论儿童发展的平均轨迹以及发展中的异质性对干预结果的影响。数据包括来自儿童(N = 1967)及其父母和教师的基线(春季)评估和四次随访评估(共5个时间点)。WITS代表“走开、忽视、倾诉、寻求帮助”(www.witsprograms.com)。干预学校的儿童在关系型受害报告方面的下降速度比对照学校的儿童慢。相对于对照学校的儿童,干预学校的儿童在攻击行为和情绪问题方面的下降速度也更快。调节分析表明,基线情绪问题水平较高的干预组儿童在情绪问题方面的下降速度比基线问题水平较低的儿童更快。此外,三年级及以上的儿童完成了学校氛围问卷,与干预学校的儿童相比,基线时对学校氛围有更多负面看法的对照学校儿童在这些负面看法上的增加幅度更大。我们讨论了儿童发展的平均轨迹和儿童内部异质性在评估中对研究结果解释的潜在影响。我们还通过强调评估设计的改进来得出结论,这些改进可能会提高我们未来检验针对小学生预防性干预效果的能力。