Dambha Tasneem, Swanepoel De Wet, Mahomed-Asmail Faheema, De Sousa Karina C, Graham Marien A, Smits Cas
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):378-391. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00159. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
This study compared the test characteristics, test-retest reliability, and test efficiency of three novel digits-in-noise (DIN) test procedures to a conventional antiphasic 23-trial adaptive DIN (D23).
One hundred twenty participants with an average age of 42 years ( = 19) were included. Participants were tested and retested with four different DIN procedures. Three new DIN procedures were compared to the reference D23 version: (a) a self-selected DIN (DSS) to allow participants to indicate a subjective speech recognition threshold (SRT), (b) a combination of self-selected and adaptive eight-trial DIN (DC8) that utilized a self-selected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) followed by an eight-trial adaptive DIN procedure, and (c) a fixed SNR DIN (DF) approach using a fixed SNR value for all presentations to produce a pass/fail test result.
Test-retest reliability of the D23 procedure was better than that of the DSS and DC8 procedures. SRTs from DSS and DC8 were significantly higher than SRTs from D23. DSS was not accurate to discriminate between normal-hearing and hard of hearing listeners. The DF and DC8 procedures with an adapted cutoff showed good hearing screening test characteristics. All three novel DIN procedure durations were significantly shorter (< 70 s) than that of D23. DF showed a reduction of 46% in the number of presentations compared to D23 (from 23 presentations to an average of 12.5).
The DF and DC8 procedures had significantly lower test durations than the reference D23 and show potential to be more time-efficient screening tools to determine normal hearing or potential hearing loss. Further studies are needed to optimize the DC8 procedure. The reference D23 remains the most reliable and accurate DIN hearing screening test, but studies in which the potentially efficient new DIN procedures are compared to pure-tone thresholds are needed to validate these procedures.
本研究将三种新型噪声中数字(DIN)测试程序的测试特性、重测信度和测试效率与传统的23次反相自适应DIN(D23)进行了比较。
纳入120名平均年龄42岁(=19)的参与者。参与者使用四种不同的DIN程序进行测试和重测。将三种新的DIN程序与参考D23版本进行比较:(a)自我选择的DIN(DSS),以允许参与者指明主观言语识别阈值(SRT);(b)自我选择和自适应八次试验DIN(DC8)的组合,其先采用自我选择的信噪比(SNR),随后是八次试验的自适应DIN程序;(c)固定SNR DIN(DF)方法,对所有测试呈现使用固定的SNR值以产生通过/失败测试结果。
D23程序的重测信度优于DSS和DC8程序。DSS和DC8的SRT显著高于D23的SRT。DSS在区分正常听力和听力受损听众方面不准确。采用适应性截止值的DF和DC8程序显示出良好的听力筛查测试特性。所有三种新型DIN程序的持续时间均显著短于D23(<70秒)。与D23相比,DF的测试呈现次数减少了46%(从23次测试呈现减少到平均12.5次)。
DF和DC8程序的测试持续时间明显低于参考D23,显示出作为更高效省时的筛查工具来确定正常听力或潜在听力损失的潜力。需要进一步研究以优化DC8程序。参考D23仍然是最可靠、准确的DIN听力筛查测试,但需要进行将潜在高效的新DIN程序与纯音阈值进行比较的研究来验证这些程序。