• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知兴趣与探究的客观性。

Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry.

作者信息

Wilholt Torsten

机构信息

Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Philosophie, Germany.

出版信息

Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022 Feb;91:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.009
PMID:34891050
Abstract

This paper advocates for making epistemic interests a central object of philosophical analysis in epistemology and philosophy of science. It is argued that the importance of epistemic interests derives from their fundamental importance for the notion of objectivity. Epistemic interests are defined as individuated by a set of objectives, each of which represents a dimension of the search for truth. Among these dimensions, specificity, sensitivity, and productivity (the rate at which results are delivered per unit of time) are discussed in detail. It is argued that the relevance of productivity is often overlooked in debates about the ends and means of science. A definition of the objectivity of inquiry is proposed that takes the notion of epistemic interest as its starting point.

摘要

本文主张将认知兴趣作为认识论和科学哲学中哲学分析的核心对象。有人认为,认知兴趣的重要性源于它们对客观性概念的根本重要性。认知兴趣被定义为由一组目标所个体化,每个目标都代表了寻求真理的一个维度。在这些维度中,详细讨论了特异性、敏感性和生产率(单位时间内产生结果的速率)。有人认为,在关于科学目的和手段的辩论中,生产率的相关性常常被忽视。本文提出了一种以认知兴趣概念为出发点的探究客观性的定义。

相似文献

1
Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry.认知兴趣与探究的客观性。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022 Feb;91:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
Standpoint Epistemology and Nursing Science.立场认识论与护理科学。
Nurs Sci Q. 2022 Jan;35(1):41-45. doi: 10.1177/08943184211051361.
3
Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?威廉·克鲁克斯爵士在认知上是否具有美德?
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Dec;48 Pt A:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
4
Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.跨学科研究的认识论——科学哲学范式的转变
Eur J Philos Sci. 2019;9(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
A normative analysis of nursing knowledge.护理知识的规范分析。
Nurs Inq. 2016 Mar;23(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/nin.12108. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
6
Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy.科学与法律中的客观性:一种共同的挽救策略。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
7
Philosophical import of non-epistemic values in clinical trials and data interpretation.临床试验与数据解读中非认知价值的哲学意义。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2019 Mar 21;41(2):14. doi: 10.1007/s40656-019-0251-4.
8
Does environmental science crowd out non-epistemic values?环境科学是否排挤非认知价值?
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2021 Jun;87:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
Fleck and the social constitution of scientific objectivity.弗莱克与科学客观性的社会建构
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009 Dec;40(4):272-85. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
10
The epistemic innocence of psychedelic states.迷幻状态的认知无罪性。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Jan;39:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Nature of Knowledge and Epistemic Interests of Radiography Science-An Analysis of Doctoral Dissertations Using Critical Normative Epistemology Framework.放射科学的知识本质与认知兴趣——基于批判性规范认识论框架的博士论文分析
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70105. doi: 10.1111/scs.70105.