Pickett Kurt M, Tolman Greg L, Wheeler Ward C, Wenzel John W
Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street at Central Park West, New York, NY 10024, USA.
295 Bennett Avenue, 5E, New York, NY 10040, USA.
Cladistics. 2005 Oct;21(5):438-445. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00076.x.
Many authors have demonstrated that the parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis can fail to estimate phylogeny accurately under certain conditions when data follow a model that stipulates homogeneity of the evolutionary process. These demonstrations further show that no matter how much data are added, parsimony will forever exhibit this statistical inconsistency if the additional data have the same distributional properties as the original data. This final component-that the additional data must follow the same distribution as the original data-is crucial to the demonstration. Recent simulations show, however, that if data evolve heterogeneously, parsimony can perform consistently. Here we show, using natural data, that parsimony can overcome inconsistency if new data from the same gene are added to an analysis already exhibiting a condition indistinguishable from inconsistency.
许多作者已经证明,当数据遵循规定进化过程同质性的模型时,系统发育分析的简约法在某些条件下可能无法准确估计系统发育。这些证明进一步表明,无论添加多少数据,如果附加数据与原始数据具有相同的分布特性,简约法将永远表现出这种统计不一致性。这最后一个要素——附加数据必须与原始数据遵循相同的分布——对证明至关重要。然而,最近的模拟表明,如果数据异质进化,简约法可以表现出一致性。在这里,我们使用自然数据表明,如果将来自同一基因的新数据添加到已经表现出与不一致难以区分的条件的分析中,简约法可以克服不一致性。