Xu Yun, Zhou Jin, Ma Ling, Jin Song, Yan Ling-Zhi, Shang Jing-Jing, Wu De-Pei, Fu Cheng-Cheng
Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China E-mail: fuzhengzheng@ suda.edu.cn.
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec;29(6):1831-1836. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.06.024.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of BUCY (busulfan and cyclophosphamide) conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
The clinical data of 72 MM patients received transplantation in the Hematology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from May 2012 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 36 patients received BUCY conditioning regimen while the others received high-dose melphalan (HDM) conditioning regimen. The complication, post-transplantation hematopoietic reconstitution and efficacy between the two groups were compared.
There were no significant differences in sex, age, isotype, stage, induction therapy, mobilization method and proportion of conditioning regimen with Bortezomib between the two groups. The median time of neutrophil engraftment for the patients in BUCY and HDM groups was 10 (8-17) and 10 (9-13) d (P=0.046), and the median time of platelet engraftment was 10 (8-18) and 11 (9-47) d (P=0.017), respectively. The transplant related mortality of the patients in both groups was 2.7%. The CR rates of the patients after ASCT (38.9% and 50.0%) were higher than those before ASCT (27.8% and 19.4%) in the two groups. For the patients in BUCY group, the median follow-up time was 45 (0-61) months. Fifteen patients (41.7%) achieved disease progression. While for the patients in HDM group, the median follow-up time was 52(0-75) months. Twenty-two patients (61.1%) achieved disease progression.
The BUCY conditioning regimen is a safe and effective therapy for ASCT in patients with MM. Besides, in terms of safety and efficacy, BUCY regimen is not inferior to HDM regimen. BUCY regimen may replace HDM regimen as a standard conditioning regimen for ASCT in MM.
评估白消安和环磷酰胺(BUCY)预处理方案用于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)的安全性和有效性。
回顾性分析2012年5月至2015年6月在苏州大学第一附属医院血液科接受移植的72例MM患者的临床资料。其中36例患者接受BUCY预处理方案,其余患者接受大剂量美法仑(HDM)预处理方案。比较两组的并发症、移植后造血重建及疗效。
两组患者在性别、年龄、免疫球蛋白类型、分期、诱导治疗、动员方法及含硼替佐米的预处理方案比例方面无显著差异。BUCY组和HDM组患者中性粒细胞植入的中位时间分别为10(8 - 17)天和10(9 - 13)天(P = 0.046),血小板植入的中位时间分别为10(8 - 18)天和11(9 - 47)天(P = 0.017)。两组患者的移植相关死亡率均为2.7%。两组患者自体造血干细胞移植后完全缓解(CR)率(38.9%和50.0%)均高于移植前(27.8%和19.4%)。BUCY组患者的中位随访时间为45(0 - 61)个月。15例患者(41.7%)疾病进展。而HDM组患者的中位随访时间为52(0 - 75)个月。22例患者(61.1%)疾病进展。
BUCY预处理方案用于MM患者自体造血干细胞移植是一种安全有效的治疗方法。此外,在安全性和有效性方面,BUCY方案并不劣于HDM方案。BUCY方案可能替代HDM方案成为MM患者自体造血干细胞移植的标准预处理方案。