Population Health Sciences, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Pediatrics, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 10;11(12):e055455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055455.
Parents who receive the diagnosis of a life-threatening, complex heart defect in their fetus or neonate face a difficult choice between pursuing termination (for fetal diagnoses), palliative care or complex surgical interventions. Shared decision making (SDM) is recommended in clinical contexts where there is clinical equipoise. SDM can be facilitated by decision aids. The International Patient Decision Aids Standards collaboration recommends the inclusion of values clarification methods (VCMs), yet little evidence exists concerning the incremental impact of VCMs on patient or surrogate decision making. This protocol describes a randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a decision aid (with and without a VCM) on parental mental health and decision making within a clinical encounter.
Parents who have a fetus or neonate diagnosed with one of six complex congenital heart defects at a single tertiary centre will be recruited. Data collection for the prospective observational control group was conducted September 2018 to December 2020 (N=35) and data collection for two intervention groups is ongoing (began October 2020). At least 100 participants will be randomised 1:1 to two intervention groups (decision aid only vs decision aid with VCM). For the intervention groups, data will be collected at four time points: (1) at diagnosis, (2) postreceipt of decision aid, (3) postdecision and (4) 3 months postdecision. Data collection for the control group was the same, except they did not receive a survey at time 2. Linear mixed effects models will assess differences between study arms in distress (primary outcome), grief and decision quality (secondary outcomes) at 3-month post-treatment decision.
This study was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board. Study findings have and will continue to be presented at national conferences and within scientific research journals.
NCT04437069 (Pre-results).
在胎儿或新生儿被诊断出患有危及生命的复杂心脏缺陷时,父母需要在终止妊娠(针对胎儿诊断)、姑息治疗或复杂手术干预之间做出艰难的选择。在存在临床均衡的情况下,建议采用共享决策(SDM)。决策辅助工具可以促进 SDM。国际患者决策辅助标准协作组织建议纳入价值观澄清方法(VCM),但关于 VCM 对患者或代理人决策的增量影响的证据很少。本方案描述了一项随机临床试验,以评估决策辅助工具(带和不带 VCM)对临床环境中父母心理健康和决策的影响。
在单一三级中心被诊断出患有六种复杂先天性心脏缺陷之一的胎儿或新生儿的父母将被招募。前瞻性观察对照组的数据收集于 2018 年 9 月至 2020 年 12 月进行(N=35),两个干预组的数据收集正在进行中(始于 2020 年 10 月)。至少 100 名参与者将以 1:1 的比例随机分为两组干预组(仅决策辅助工具与决策辅助工具+VCM)。对于干预组,将在四个时间点收集数据:(1)诊断时,(2)收到决策辅助工具后,(3)决策后,(4)决策后 3 个月。对照组的数据收集相同,只是他们在时间 2 时没有收到调查。线性混合效应模型将评估研究臂在 3 个月治疗决策后在痛苦(主要结局)、悲伤和决策质量(次要结局)方面的差异。
本研究已获得犹他大学机构审查委员会的批准。研究结果已并将继续在全国会议和科学研究期刊上发表。
NCT04437069(预结果)。