• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产妇联合腰麻-硬膜外麻醉分娩的产程进展和产科结局:一项比较研究。

Progress of labor and obstetric outcome in parturients with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: A comparative study.

机构信息

Department of OBG, JSS Medical College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JSS Medical College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Ann Afr Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;20(4):270-275. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_59_20.

DOI:10.4103/aam.aam_59_20
PMID:34893564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8693742/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alleviation of labour pain is known to improve maternal and fetal outcome. Combined Spinal-Epidural (CSE) analgesia is an excellent method.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

In view of reports of its concerns on labour, this study was conducted to evaluate the progress of labour, obstetric outcome in cases with and without CSE analgesia, the maternal pain relief and fetomaternal adverse effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this comparative study, 60 parturients were allocated into case and control groups of 30 each. CSE analgesia was administered utilizing 0.5 ml of 0.125% Levobupivacaine / 0.2% Ropivacaine with 2 mcg/ml fentanyl. Progress of labour was recorded in partogram including duration of labour, mode of delivery, pain relief - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, development of motor block, maternal satisfaction and Apgar score. Data was analyzed by Descriptive and Inferential statistics.

RESULTS

Mean duration of first and second stage of labour among cases was 530±44.1 minutes, 61.5±12.7 minutes respectively and that of control was 526.6±64.9 minutes, 60±10.8 minutes respectively with no prolongation of labour P > 0.05. CSE analgesia did not alter the mode of delivery P=0.145 with rapid onset of pain relief. Apgar score was normal in both groups. Total 29 (97%) parturients experienced effective labour analgesia following CSE analgesia with VAS score 0. Maternal adverse effects included pruritus, transient initial motor blockade and post spinal headache.

CONCLUSION

CSE analgesia did not affect the duration of labour, mode of delivery with minimal fetomaternal adverse effects and provides rapid onset of pain relief . CSE analgesia can be considered for safe and effective labour analgesia.

摘要

背景

减轻分娩疼痛已被证明可以改善母婴结局。联合硬膜外(CSE)镇痛是一种极好的方法。

目的和目标

鉴于其对分娩的担忧报告,本研究旨在评估有和没有 CSE 镇痛的情况下分娩进展、产科结局、产妇疼痛缓解和母婴不良影响。

材料和方法

在这项比较研究中,将 60 名产妇分配到病例组和对照组,每组 30 名。CSE 镇痛采用 0.5 毫升 0.125%左旋布比卡因/0.2%罗哌卡因加 2 微克/毫升芬太尼进行。产程进展记录在产程图中,包括产程持续时间、分娩方式、疼痛缓解-视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、运动阻滞的发展、产妇满意度和阿普加评分。数据采用描述性和推断性统计进行分析。

结果

病例组第一产程和第二产程的平均持续时间分别为 530±44.1 分钟和 61.5±12.7 分钟,对照组分别为 526.6±64.9 分钟和 60±10.8 分钟,产程无延长 P>0.05。CSE 镇痛并没有改变分娩方式 P=0.145,具有快速的疼痛缓解作用。两组的 Apgar 评分均正常。CSE 镇痛后,29 名(97%)产妇经历了有效的分娩镇痛,VAS 评分为 0。产妇的不良反应包括瘙痒、短暂的初始运动阻滞和脊麻后头痛。

结论

CSE 镇痛不会影响产程持续时间和分娩方式,对母婴的不良影响最小,并提供快速的疼痛缓解。CSE 镇痛可作为安全有效的分娩镇痛方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/ca84ded93449/AAM-20-270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/6df2d4fdbf02/AAM-20-270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/6016bac98735/AAM-20-270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/a45e342fe85c/AAM-20-270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/ca84ded93449/AAM-20-270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/6df2d4fdbf02/AAM-20-270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/6016bac98735/AAM-20-270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/a45e342fe85c/AAM-20-270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5115/8693742/ca84ded93449/AAM-20-270-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Progress of labor and obstetric outcome in parturients with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: A comparative study.产妇联合腰麻-硬膜外麻醉分娩的产程进展和产科结局:一项比较研究。
Ann Afr Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;20(4):270-275. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_59_20.
2
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.分娩期女性的疼痛管理:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
3
Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.分娩时联合脊髓硬膜外麻醉与硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3.
4
Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine with and without fentanyl in combined spinal epidural for labor analgesia.鞘内注射左布比卡因联合与不联合芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉比较
Med Sci Monit. 2004 Jul;10(7):PI87-91. Epub 2004 Jun 29.
5
A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery.在私人执业环境中硬膜外镇痛与腰硬联合麻醉的随机对照比较:第一产程和第二产程及分娩时的疼痛评分。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Mar;116(3):636-43. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827e4e29. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome.分娩时联合脊髓硬膜外镇痛:其对分娩结局的影响。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 May-Jun;66(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.分娩时硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.
8
The effect of adding a background infusion to patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在患者自控硬膜外分娩镇痛中添加背景输注对分娩、母体及新生儿结局的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):149-158. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000743.
9
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia for laboring parturients in a Nigerian Hospital.尼日利亚一家医院对分娩产妇采用腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛法。
Ann Afr Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;14(3):143-7. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.149920.
10
Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?对于未产妇,硬膜外镇痛与腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛相比,是否会延长产程并增加器械助产和剖宫产的风险?
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):94-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.020.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Contemporary and Emerging Analgesia Techniques for Natural Labor-Patient-Centered Approaches and Technological Advances.自然分娩当代及新兴镇痛技术的系统评价——以患者为中心的方法和技术进展
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 5;14(11):3977. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113977.

本文引用的文献

1
Delivery mode and maternal and neonatal outcomes of combined spinal-epidural analgesia compared with no analgesia in spontaneous labor: A single-center observational study in Japan.与未使用镇痛相比,腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛用于自然分娩的分娩方式及母婴结局:日本一项单中心观察性研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Mar;46(3):425-433. doi: 10.1111/jog.14194. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
2
Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia.罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼用于硬膜外麻醉和腰硬联合麻醉在分娩镇痛中的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0855-y.
3
Adverse side effects and route of administration of opioids in combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
椎管内联合镇痛分娩中阿片类药物的不良反应和给药途径:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Feb;41:83-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
[Neuraxial labor analgesia: a literature review].[椎管内分娩镇痛:文献综述]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 May-Jun;69(3):291-298. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
[Combined spinal-epidural block for labor analgesia. Comparative study with continuous epidural block].[腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛。与连续硬膜外阻滞的比较研究]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan-Feb;69(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome.分娩时联合脊髓硬膜外镇痛:其对分娩结局的影响。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 May-Jun;66(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
7
Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future.椎管内镇痛对产程进展的影响:事实、谬误、不确定性与未来。
BJOG. 2015 Feb;122(3):288-93. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12966. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
The effects of epidural/spinal opioids in labour analgesia on neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.硬膜外/脊髓阿片类药物用于分娩镇痛对新生儿结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Aug;61(8):695-709. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0185-y. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
9
Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia for labor and delivery.腰硬联合麻醉与硬膜外麻醉用于分娩镇痛。
Clin Perinatol. 2013 Sep;40(3):373-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery.在私人执业环境中硬膜外镇痛与腰硬联合麻醉的随机对照比较:第一产程和第二产程及分娩时的疼痛评分。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Mar;116(3):636-43. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827e4e29. Epub 2013 Feb 11.