Ding Ning, Zhao Zhiqing, Yin Na, Xu Ying, Yin Tian, Gou Jingxin, He Haibing, Wang Yanjiao, Zhang Yu, Tang Xing
Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
School of Functional Food and Wine, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, 110016, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Pharm Res. 2021 Dec;38(12):2091-2108. doi: 10.1007/s11095-021-03139-0. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
The intention of the study was to co-delivery gemcitabine and cisplatin with totally different nature by prodrug and micelle strategy to improve its in vivo stability and antitumor effect.
A prodrug of gemcitabine (mPEG-PLG-GEM) was synthesized through the covalent conjugation between the primary amino group of gemcitabine and the carboxylic group of poly (L-glutamic acid)-g-methoxy poly (ethylene glycol) (mPEG-PLG). It was prepared into micelles by a solvent diffusion method, and then combined with cisplatin through chelation to prepare gemcitabine and cisplatin co-loaded mPEG-PLG micelles (mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP micelles).
Gemcitabine and cisplatin in each micelle group were released more slowly than in solutions. In addition, pharmacokinetics behaviors of them were improved after encapsulated in prodrug micelles. T of gemcitabine and cisplatin encapsulated in micelles were prolonged to 6.357 h (mPEG-PLG-GEM), 10.490 h (mPEG-PLG@CDDP), 5.463 h and 12.540 h (mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP) compared with GEM@CDDP solutions (T = 1.445 h and 7.740 h). The ratio of synergy between gemcitabine and cisplatin (3:1 ~ 1:1(n/n)) was guaranteed in the systemic circulation, thus improving its antitumor effect. The results of biochemical analysis showed that GEM@CDDP-Sol was more toxic to kidneys and marrow compared with mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP micelles.
By prodrug strategy, gemcitabine and cisplatin with totally different nature were prepared into micelles and obtained a better pharmacokinetic behavior. And the dual drug delivery system performed a better in vivo stability and antitumor effect compared with each single drug delivery system in the experiment. Scheme. Schematic of mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP micelles' formation and action process.
本研究旨在通过前药和胶束策略共同递送性质完全不同的吉西他滨和顺铂,以提高其体内稳定性和抗肿瘤效果。
通过吉西他滨的伯氨基与聚(L-谷氨酸)-γ-甲氧基聚(乙二醇)(mPEG-PLG)的羧基之间的共价共轭合成吉西他滨前药(mPEG-PLG-GEM)。通过溶剂扩散法将其制备成胶束,然后通过螯合与顺铂结合,制备吉西他滨和顺铂共载的mPEG-PLG胶束(mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP胶束)。
各胶束组中的吉西他滨和顺铂比在溶液中释放得更慢。此外,它们封装在前药胶束中后,药代动力学行为得到改善。与GEM@CDDP溶液(T=1.445小时和7.740小时)相比,封装在胶束中的吉西他滨和顺铂的T分别延长至6.357小时(mPEG-PLG-GEM)、10.490小时(mPEG-PLG@CDDP)、5.463小时和12.540小时(mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP)。在体循环中保证了吉西他滨和顺铂之间的协同比例(3:1至1:1(n/n)),从而提高了其抗肿瘤效果。生化分析结果表明,与mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP胶束相比,GEM@CDDP-Sol对肾脏和骨髓的毒性更大。
通过前药策略,将性质完全不同的吉西他滨和顺铂制备成胶束,并获得了更好的药代动力学行为。在实验中,与每种单一药物递送系统相比,双药递送系统表现出更好的体内稳定性和抗肿瘤效果。方案。mPEG-PLG-GEM@CDDP胶束形成和作用过程的示意图。