Adelsmayr Gabriel, Haidmayer Andreas, Spreizer Christopher, Janisch Michael, Quehenberger Franz, Klocker Eva, Graninger Winfried, Fuchsjäger Michael, Hermann Josef
Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Insights Imaging. 2021 Dec 11;12(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01127-x.
Imaging of morphologic changes in the vertebral spine in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) is routinely performed with conventional radiography limited by superposition in the thoracic segments and radiation exposure. The objective was to assess the reliability of MRI compared to conventional radiography in depicting morphologic vertebral lesions in patients with axial SpA. Forty patients diagnosed with axial SpA were included in this cross-sectional study. Patients underwent MRI of the whole spine with T1-weighted and TIRM sequences in the sagittal plane and conventional radiography of the cervical and lumbar spine in lateral projections. Morphologic changes (syndesmophytes and erosions) in the anterior vertebral endplates on MRI and conventional radiography were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Inter-modality and interobserver agreement were calculated using Cohen's Kappa.
Inter-modality agreement was low for cervical and lumbar syndesmophytes and erosions (κ ≤ 0.2 ± 0.07-0.1). Interobserver agreement on conventional radiography was highest for cervical and lumbar anterior syndesmophytes/bridging (κ = 0.92 ± 0.02-0.03). Syndesmophytes in thoracic anterior vertebral units were the most frequent MRI finding with a high interobserver agreement (κ = 0.83 ± 0.05).
In imaging morphologic changes in the spine in patients with axial SpA, MRI was shown to be not an equivalent substitute but a complementary imaging modality to conventional radiography. Conventional radiography seems superior to depict morphologic cervical and lumbar vertebral changes compared to MRI, whereas MRI may visualise morphologic lesions in the thoracic spine.
在轴性脊柱关节炎(SpA)中,常规采用传统X线摄影对脊柱形态学改变进行成像,但受胸椎节段重叠和辐射暴露的限制。目的是评估与传统X线摄影相比,MRI在描绘轴性SpA患者脊柱形态学病变方面的可靠性。本横断面研究纳入了40例诊断为轴性SpA的患者。患者接受了全脊柱MRI检查,矢状面采用T1加权和TIRM序列,以及颈椎和腰椎的传统X线侧位片检查。两名放射科医生分别独立评估MRI和传统X线摄影上椎体前缘的形态学改变(骨桥和侵蚀)。使用Cohen's Kappa计算不同检查方法间和观察者间的一致性。
颈椎和腰椎骨桥及侵蚀的不同检查方法间一致性较低(κ≤0.2±0.07 - 0.1)。传统X线摄影中,观察者间对颈椎和腰椎前缘骨桥/连接的一致性最高(κ = 0.92±0.02 - 0.03)。胸椎椎体单元前缘的骨桥是MRI最常见的表现,观察者间一致性较高(κ = 0.83±0.05)。
在对轴性SpA患者脊柱形态学改变进行成像时,MRI并非传统X线摄影的等效替代方法,而是一种补充性成像方式。与MRI相比,传统X线摄影在描绘颈椎和腰椎形态学改变方面似乎更具优势;而MRI可能更有助于显示胸椎的形态学病变。