Suppr超能文献

开发一种抽象工具来评估姑息治疗的组成部分。

Development of an Abstraction Tool to Assess Palliative Care Components.

机构信息

Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 539576Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.

22916Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;39(12):1418-1427. doi: 10.1177/10499091211061724. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

Abstract

Little is known regarding the fidelity of delivery of guideline-recommended components of palliative care in "real world" encounters. To develop a qualitative coding framework to identify components of clinical palliative care in clinical documentation across care settings. Retrospective review of palliative care clinical documentation from medical providers, with directed qualitative content analysis to identify components of clinical care documented. Purposively sampled deceased patients seen by palliative care at a US academic medical center between 7/1/2011-7/1/2018. The outcome of this work is a coding framework for use in future research. We assessed the robustness of the framework using Cohen's kappa. We reviewed sixty-two encounters from twenty-six patients. We identified 7 major themes in documentation: (1) addressing physical symptoms, (2) addressing psychological symptoms, (3) establishing illness understanding, (4) supporting decision making, (5) end-of-life planning, (6) understanding psychosocial context, and (7) care coordination. Interrater reliability varied widely between components, with Cohen's kappa ranging from -.51 to 1. This pilot study provides a coding framework to measure documentation of clinical palliative care components. Several components could not be reliably identified using this framework, suggesting the need for additional measurement strategies.

摘要

对于在“真实世界”中提供姑息治疗指南推荐内容的准确性知之甚少。为了开发一种定性编码框架,以确定跨护理环境的临床姑息治疗文档中的临床护理组件。对医疗保健提供者的姑息治疗临床文档进行回顾性审查,采用定向定性内容分析来识别记录的临床护理组件。选择 2011 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 1 日期间在美国学术医疗中心接受姑息治疗的已故患者进行前瞻性抽样。这项工作的结果是一个用于未来研究的编码框架。我们使用 Cohen 的 kappa 评估框架的稳健性。我们回顾了 26 名患者的 62 次就诊记录。我们在记录中确定了 7 个主要主题:(1)解决身体症状,(2)解决心理症状,(3)建立疾病理解,(4)支持决策,(5)临终计划,(6)了解心理社会背景,(7)护理协调。各个组件之间的评分者间可靠性差异很大,Cohen 的 kappa 值范围从 -.51 到 1。这项试点研究提供了一个编码框架,用于衡量临床姑息治疗组件的文档记录。使用此框架无法可靠地识别几个组件,这表明需要额外的测量策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验