• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放科学未能渗透到学术招聘实践中:一项横断面研究。

Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Interdisciplinary Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;144:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.003
PMID:34896237
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current hiring practices of academic institutions around the world, with regard to the mention of advertisements for Open Science (OS) in research based, faculty, and postdoctoral positions.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study, using 189 global institutions from the Center for Science and Technology Leiden ranking of world universities of 2017, including the U15 Group (Canadian Research-Intensive Universities), and five self-selected supplementary institutions.

METHODS

The main outcome measure for our study is the level of OS in job advertisements, assessed using the Modified Open Science Modular Scheme.

RESULTS

After assessing 305 job advertisements for academic positions in 91 institutions, only 2 (0.6%) had any explicit mention of OS in their job advertisements on the Modified Open Science Modular Scheme. The sample assessed the level of open science for 39.0% Associate and/or Assistant professor positions, 30.8% Researcher and/or Postdoctoral fellow positions, and 18.7% of Tenured positions. The remaining 11.5% were for positions such as lectureship, research associate, chair, dean, director and other.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the need for increased recognition of OS as a characteristic in research-active job advertisements. As evident in the alarmingly low percentage of job advertisements that mentioned OS (0.6%), the movement towards enhanced OS profiles across academic institutions is highly encouraged. This can be achieved through increased recognition of OS in research job advertisements and demonstrating the means in which institutions promote OS such as, encouraging preprints, publishing in open access journals, and the importance of data sharing.

摘要

背景与目的

评估全球学术机构目前的招聘实践,重点关注基于研究的教职员工和博士后职位广告中对开放科学(OS)的提及。

研究设计

采用 2017 年莱顿世界大学排名中心的 189 所全球机构和 U15 集团(加拿大研究密集型大学)的横断面研究,以及五个自选补充机构。

方法

我们研究的主要结果衡量标准是使用修改后的开放科学模块化方案评估职位广告中的 OS 水平。

结果

在评估了 91 家机构的 305 个学术职位广告后,只有 2 个(0.6%)在其职位广告中使用修改后的开放科学模块化方案明确提到了 OS。该样本评估了副教授和/或助理教授职位的开放科学水平为 39.0%,研究员和/或博士后职位为 30.8%,终身教职职位为 18.7%。其余 11.5%是为讲师、研究助理、主席、院长、主任和其他职位保留的。

结论

这项研究强调了在研究活跃的职位广告中增加对 OS 的认可的必要性。从明显低得令人震惊的提到 OS 的职位广告百分比(0.6%)可以看出,强烈鼓励在学术机构中推广 OS 以增强 OS 配置文件。这可以通过增加对研究职位广告中 OS 的认可并展示机构如何促进 OS 来实现,例如鼓励预印本、在开放获取期刊上发表以及数据共享的重要性。

相似文献

1
Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: a cross-sectional study.开放科学未能渗透到学术招聘实践中:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;144:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.生物医学科学教师晋升和终身教职的学术标准:对国际大学样本的横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2081.
3
A survey-based analysis of the academic job market.基于调查的学术就业市场分析。
Elife. 2020 Jun 12;9:e54097. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54097.
4
A systematic exclusion induced by institutional ranking in engineering faculty hiring: Introducing a cycle of winners and losers.制度性排名导致工程学院教师招聘中的系统性排斥:引入赢家和输家的循环。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0275861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275861. eCollection 2022.
5
Gender coding in job advertisements for academic, non-academic, and leadership positions in emergency medicine.急诊医学领域学术、非学术及领导职位招聘广告中的性别编码
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 May;55:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
6
Habits and perceptions regarding open science by researchers from Spanish institutions.西班牙研究人员的开放科学习惯和观念。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0288313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288313. eCollection 2023.
7
Open Access uptake by universities worldwide.全球范围内大学对开放获取的采用情况。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 8;8:e9410. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9410. eCollection 2020.
8
Careers of an elite cohort of U.S. basic life science postdoctoral fellows and the influence of their mentor's citation record.美国基础生命科学博士后精英群体的职业发展及其导师引文记录的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Nov 15;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-80.
9
Sex Differences in Academic Rank and Publication Rate at Top-Ranked US Neurology Programs.顶尖美国神经病学项目的学术排名和发表率中的性别差异。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):956-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0275.
10
The Academic Career Readiness Assessment: Clarifying Hiring and Training Expectations for Future Biomedical Life Sciences Faculty.学术生涯准备评估:明确未来生物医学生命科学教师的招聘和培训期望。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Jun;19(2):ar22. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0235.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving medical research in the United Kingdom.提高英国的医学研究水平。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 13;15(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06050-y.