Röntynen Petteri, Kukkonen Kaarina, Savinko Terhi, Mäkelä Mika J
Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Children's Hospital and Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Mar;128(3):270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
The incidence of cashew nut anaphylaxis is increasing and there is a need for accurate diagnostic tests. Age-specific cutoffs in children are lacking. Changes in serum tryptase levels are not well documented in pediatric food allergy, except in anaphylaxis.
To evaluate the ability of various tests to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. We also investigated changes in tryptase and their correlation to reaction severity.
We performed an open cashew nut challenge on 106 children (aged 1-16 years), who were sensitized to cashew nut with either previous allergic reaction to cashew nut or no known exposure. We analyzed the accuracy of Ana o 3 immunoglobulin E (IgE), cashew nut IgE, skin prick test, basophil activation test (BAT), and combinations thereof to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. Tryptase level was measured at the baseline and during an allergic reaction.
A total of 72 children had positive challenge outcomes. Ana o 3 IgE seemed to be the best single test to diagnose cashew allergy, with a 0.97 kU/L cutoff exhibiting 94.1% specificity and 61.1% sensitivity. Though BAT values of at least 22.8% best predicted reaction severity, with 91.7% specificity and 60.7% sensitivity, the cutoffs were age-specific. Tryptase levels increased substantially 1 to 2 hours after the first allergic symptoms compared with baseline.
Ana o 3 IgE seems to be the best diagnostic test in pediatric cashew nut allergy, and test combinations do not seem to improve the diagnostics. Cutoffs are age-specific. BAT is promising in predicting reaction severity. Tryptase levels should be measured 1 to 2 hours after initiation of an allergic reaction.
腰果过敏反应的发生率正在上升,因此需要准确的诊断测试。目前缺乏针对儿童的年龄特异性临界值。除过敏反应外,血清类胰蛋白酶水平在儿科食物过敏中的变化尚无充分记录。
评估各种测试诊断腰果过敏及预测反应严重程度的能力。我们还研究了类胰蛋白酶的变化及其与反应严重程度的相关性。
我们对106名1至16岁对腰果过敏的儿童进行了开放性腰果激发试验,这些儿童要么曾对腰果有过过敏反应,要么未曾接触过腰果。我们分析了Ana o 3免疫球蛋白E(IgE)、腰果IgE、皮肤点刺试验、嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)及其组合诊断腰果过敏和预测反应严重程度的准确性。在基线和过敏反应期间测量类胰蛋白酶水平。
共有72名儿童激发试验结果呈阳性。Ana o 3 IgE似乎是诊断腰果过敏的最佳单项测试,以0.97 kU/L为临界值时,特异性为94.1%,敏感性为61.1%。尽管BAT值至少为22.8%时最能预测反应严重程度,特异性为91.7%,敏感性为60.7%,但临界值是年龄特异性的。与基线相比,首次出现过敏症状后1至2小时类胰蛋白酶水平大幅升高。
Ana o 3 IgE似乎是儿科腰果过敏的最佳诊断测试,测试组合似乎并不能改善诊断效果。临界值是年龄特异性的。BAT在预测反应严重程度方面很有前景。应在过敏反应开始后1至2小时测量类胰蛋白酶水平。