Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.035. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Virginia adult cystic fibrosis (CF) center transitioned from in-person clinical encounters to a model that included interdisciplinary telemedicine. The pandemic presented an unprecedented opportunity to assess the impact of the interdisciplinary telemedicine model on clinical CF outcomes.
What are the clinical outcomes of a care model that includes interdisciplinary telemedicine (IDC-TM) compared with in-person clinical care for patients with CF during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Adults with CF were included. The prepandemic year was defined as March 17, 2019, through March 16, 2020, and the pandemic year (PY) was defined as March 17, 2020, through March 16, 2021. Patients were enrolled starting in the PY. Prepandemic data were gathered retrospectively. Telemedicine visits were defined as clinical encounters via secured video communication. Hybrid visits were in-person evaluations by physician, with in-clinic video communication by other team members. In-person visits were encounters with in-person providers only. All encounters included previsit screening. Outcomes were lung function, BMI, exacerbations, and antibiotic use. FEV percent predicted, exacerbations, and antibiotic use were adjusted for the effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment.
One hundred twenty-four patients participated. One hundred ten patients were analyzed (mean age, 35 years; range, 18-69 years). Ninety-five percent had access to telemedicine (n = 105). Telemedicine visits accounted for 64% of encounters (n = 260), hybrid visits with telemedicine support accounted for 28% of encounters (n = 114), and in-person visits accounted for 7% of encounters (n = 30). No difference in lung function or exacerbation rate during the PY was found. BMI increased from 25 to 26 kg/m (t = -4.72; P < .001). Antibiotic use decreased from 316 to 124 episodes (z = 8.81; P < .0001).
This CF care model, which includes IDC-TM, successfully monitored lung function and BMI, identified exacerbations, and followed guidelines-based care during the pandemic. A significant decrease in antibiotic use suggests that social mitigation strategies were protective.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04402801; URL: www.
gov.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,弗吉尼亚大学成人囊性纤维化 (CF) 中心将临床就诊模式从面对面转变为包括跨学科远程医疗的模式。大流行提供了一个前所未有的机会来评估跨学科远程医疗模式对 CF 临床结果的影响。
对于 CF 患者,与大流行前相比,包含跨学科远程医疗(IDC-TM)的护理模式的临床结果如何?
纳入成年 CF 患者。大流行前时期定义为 2019 年 3 月 17 日至 2020 年 3 月 16 日,大流行时期定义为 2020 年 3 月 17 日至 2021 年 3 月 16 日。患者从大流行时期开始入组。大流行前的数据通过回顾性收集。远程医疗就诊被定义为通过安全视频通信进行的临床就诊。混合就诊是指医生进行面对面评估,其他团队成员在诊所内进行视频通信。面对面就诊是指仅与面对面的提供者进行的就诊。所有就诊都包括就诊前筛查。结果是肺功能、BMI、加重和抗生素使用情况。FEV% 预测值、加重和抗生素使用情况都考虑了 elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor 治疗的影响。
共 124 名患者参与。对 110 名患者进行了分析(平均年龄 35 岁,范围 18-69 岁)。95%的患者可使用远程医疗(n=105)。远程医疗就诊占就诊次数的 64%(n=260),有远程医疗支持的混合就诊占就诊次数的 28%(n=114),面对面就诊占就诊次数的 7%(n=30)。在大流行期间,肺功能或加重率没有差异。BMI 从 25 增加到 26kg/m(t=-4.72,P<.001)。抗生素使用从 316 次减少到 124 次(z=8.81,P<.0001)。
这种包含 IDC-TM 的 CF 护理模式成功地监测了肺功能和 BMI,识别了加重,并遵循了大流行期间的基于指南的护理。抗生素使用的显著减少表明社会缓解策略具有保护作用。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT04402801;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov。
ClinicalTrials.gov。