Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022 Jan;94:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.11.036. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) may have differential effects on cardinal motor signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) in the upper and lower extremities. In addition, sites of maximally effective DBS for each sign and extremity may be distinct. Our study seeks to elucidate these structure-function relationships.
We applied an ordinary least squares linear regression model to measure motor effects of STN DBS on upper (UE) and lower (LE) extremity tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. We then applied an atlas-independent electrical-field model to identify sites of maximally effective stimulation for each sign and each extremity. Distances between sites and statistical power to resolve differences were calculated.
In our study population (n = 78 patients), STN DBS improved all cardinal motor signs (β = 0.64, p < .05). Improvement magnitudes were tremor > rigidity > bradykinesia. Effects of STN DBS on UE versus LE signs were statistically equal for tremor and bradykinesia, but greater for UE rigidity than LE rigidity (β = 0.19, p < .05). UE maximal-effect loci were lateral, anterior, and dorsal to LE loci, but were not statistically resolved, despite sufficient statistical power to resolve differences of ≤0.48 mm (p < .05) between maximally effective loci of stimulation.
STN DBS produces differential effects on UE and LE rigidity, but not for tremor or bradykinesia. This finding is not explained by distinct UE and LE loci of maximally effective stimulation. Instead, we hypothesize that downstream effects of STN DBS on motor networks and limb biomechanics are responsible for observed differences in UE and LE responses.
丘脑底核深部脑刺激(STN DBS)可能对帕金森病(PD)上肢和下肢的主要运动症状有不同的影响。此外,每个征象和肢体的最大有效 DBS 刺激部位可能不同。我们的研究旨在阐明这些结构-功能关系。
我们应用普通最小二乘线性回归模型来测量 STN DBS 对上肢(UE)和下肢(LE)震颤、僵硬和运动迟缓的运动影响。然后,我们应用了一种与图谱无关的电场模型来识别每个征象和每个肢体的最大有效刺激部位。计算了部位之间的距离和解决差异的统计能力。
在我们的研究人群(n=78 例患者)中,STN DBS 改善了所有主要运动征象(β=0.64,p<0.05)。改善幅度为震颤>僵硬>运动迟缓。STN DBS 对 UE 与 LE 征象的影响在震颤和运动迟缓方面统计学上相等,但 UE 僵硬比 LE 僵硬更大(β=0.19,p<0.05)。UE 的最大效应部位位于 LE 部位的外侧、前方和背侧,但未得到统计学解决,尽管有足够的统计能力来解决刺激的最大效应部位之间≤0.48 毫米的差异(p<0.05)。
STN DBS 对 UE 和 LE 僵硬产生不同的影响,但对震颤或运动迟缓没有影响。这一发现不能用 UE 和 LE 的最大有效刺激部位来解释。相反,我们假设 STN DBS 对运动网络和肢体生物力学的下游影响是导致 UE 和 LE 反应差异的原因。