• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

autoFC:一个用于在强制选择测试构建中进行自动项目配对的R包。

autoFC: An R Package for Automatic Item Pairing in Forced-Choice Test Construction.

作者信息

Li Mengtong, Sun Tianjun, Zhang Bo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, KS, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jan;46(1):70-72. doi: 10.1177/01466216211051726. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1177/01466216211051726
PMID:34898749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8655462/
Abstract

Recently, there has been increasing interest in adopting the forced-choice (FC) test format in non-cognitive assessments, as it demonstrates faking resistance when well-designed. However, traditional or manual pairing approaches to FC test construction are time- and effort- intensive and often involve insufficient considerations. To address these issues, we developed the new open-source R package to facilitate automated and optimized item pairing strategies. The package is intended as a practical tool for FC test constructions. Users can easily obtain automatically optimized FC tests by simply inputting the item characteristics of interest. Customizations are also available for considerations on matching rules and the behaviors of the optimization process. The package should be of interest to researchers and practitioners constructing FC scales with potentially many metrics to match on and/or many items to pair, essentially exempting users from the burden of manual item pairing and reducing the computational costs and biases induced by simple ranking methods.

摘要

最近,在非认知评估中采用强制选择(FC)测试形式的兴趣日益浓厚,因为精心设计的FC测试形式具有抗伪装能力。然而,传统的或手动的FC测试构建配对方法既耗时又费力,而且往往考虑不充分。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了新的开源R包,以促进自动化和优化的项目配对策略。该包旨在作为FC测试构建的实用工具。用户只需输入感兴趣的项目特征,即可轻松获得自动优化的FC测试。还可以进行定制,以考虑匹配规则和优化过程的行为。对于构建具有潜在许多要匹配的指标和/或许多要配对的项目的FC量表的研究人员和从业者来说,该包应该会很有用,基本上免除了用户手动进行项目配对的负担,并降低了简单排序方法带来的计算成本和偏差。

相似文献

1
autoFC: An R Package for Automatic Item Pairing in Forced-Choice Test Construction.autoFC:一个用于在强制选择测试构建中进行自动项目配对的R包。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jan;46(1):70-72. doi: 10.1177/01466216211051726. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.比较强制选择测试的传统评分与项目反应理论评分
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Nov;39(8):598-612. doi: 10.1177/0146621615585851. Epub 2015 May 19.
3
Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.多维迫选格式中的伪装建模:伪装混合模型。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):773-794. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09818-6. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.多维强制选择自适应评估中的题库组装与题目选择
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Apr;83(2):294-321. doi: 10.1177/00131644221087986. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
A 2PLM-RANK multidimensional forced-choice model and its fast estimation algorithm.A 2PLM-RANK 多维迫选模型及其快速估计算法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6363-6388. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02315-x. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.强制选择问卷与李克特量表的整合:一项模拟研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00806. eCollection 2017.
7
An R package for analyzing and modeling ranking data.一个用于分析和建模排名数据的 R 包。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 May 14;13:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-65.
8
A Meta-Analysis of the Faking Resistance of Forced-Choice Personality Inventories.强制选择式人格量表伪装抗性的元分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:732241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732241. eCollection 2021.
9
: An R Package for Bayesian Estimation of the Multidimensional Generalized Graded Unfolding Model With Covariates.一个用于带协变量的多维广义分级展开模型的贝叶斯估计的R包。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Oct;45(7-8):553-555. doi: 10.1177/01466216211040488. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.强迫是否会减少伪装?高风险情境下迫选人格测验的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1347-1368. doi: 10.1037/apl0000414. Epub 2019 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.用于强迫选择测试的多维项目反应理论:文献综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26884. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
2
On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.多维强制选择自适应评估中的题库组装与题目选择
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Apr;83(2):294-321. doi: 10.1177/00131644221087986. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.强迫是否会减少伪装?高风险情境下迫选人格测验的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1347-1368. doi: 10.1037/apl0000414. Epub 2019 May 9.