Lodoli Claudio, Covino Marcello, Attalla El Halabieh Miriam, Santullo Francesco, Di Giorgio Andrea, Abatini Carlo, Rotolo Stefano, Rodolfino Elena, Giovinazzo Francesco, Fagotti Anna, Scambia Giovanni, Franceschi Francesco, Pacelli Fabio
Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 26;8:769658. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.769658. eCollection 2021.
Patients with peritoneal metastasis frequently develop malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). Medical palliative management is preferred but often fails. Conversely, the role of palliative surgery remains unclear and debated. This study aims to identify patients who could benefit from invasive surgical interventions and factors associated with successful surgical palliation. In this retrospective study, 98 consecutive patients who underwent palliative surgery for MBO over 5 years were reviewed. We evaluate as the primary outcome surgical failure to select patients who could benefit from palliative surgery, avoiding unnecessary surgery. A prognostic score was developed based on a logistic regression model to identify patients at risk of surgical failure. The score was evaluated for overall accuracy by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Palliative surgery was achieved in 76 (77.5%) patients. The variables that were found to be significant factors for surgical failure are recurrent disease ( = 0.015), absence of bowel obstruction ( < 0.001), absence of bowel distension ( < 0.001), and mesenteric involvement ( = 0.001) and retraction (P < 0.001). The absence of bowel distension ( = 0.046) and bowel obstruction ( = 0.012) emerged as independent predictors of surgical failure. Carcinomatosis level assessment for peritoneum score, based on these factors, was built to evaluate the risk of surgical failure. Our proposed scoring system might help select patients most likely to benefit from palliative surgery.
腹膜转移患者常发生恶性肠梗阻(MBO)。医学姑息治疗是首选,但往往失败。相反,姑息性手术的作用仍不明确且存在争议。本研究旨在确定可从侵入性手术干预中获益的患者以及与手术姑息成功相关的因素。在这项回顾性研究中,对连续98例在5年内接受MBO姑息性手术的患者进行了评估。我们将手术失败作为主要观察指标,以筛选出可从姑息性手术中获益的患者,避免不必要的手术。基于逻辑回归模型开发了一个预后评分系统,以识别有手术失败风险的患者。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析评估该评分系统的总体准确性。76例(77.5%)患者实现了姑息性手术。发现的手术失败的显著因素包括疾病复发(P = 0.015)、无肠梗阻(P < 0.001)、无肠扩张(P < 0.001)、肠系膜受累(P = 0.001)和退缩(P < 0.001)。无肠扩张(P = 0.046)和肠梗阻(P = 0.012)是手术失败的独立预测因素。基于这些因素构建了腹膜癌病水平评估的腹膜评分,以评估手术失败的风险。我们提出的评分系统可能有助于筛选出最有可能从姑息性手术中获益的患者。