Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 恢复期血浆治疗住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Department of Microbiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):115-126. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6850.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is clinical equipoise for COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of CCP compared with placebo in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 receiving noninvasive supplemental oxygen.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: CONTAIN COVID-19, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of CCP in hospitalized adults with COVID-19, was conducted at 21 US hospitals from April 17, 2020, to March 15, 2021. The trial enrolled 941 participants who were hospitalized for 3 or less days or presented 7 or less days after symptom onset and required noninvasive oxygen supplementation.

INTERVENTIONS

A unit of approximately 250 mL of CCP or equivalent volume of placebo (normal saline).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was participant scores on the 11-point World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement on day 14 after randomization; the secondary outcome was WHO scores determined on day 28. Subgroups were analyzed with respect to age, baseline WHO score, concomitant medications, symptom duration, CCP SARS-CoV-2 titer, baseline SARS-CoV-2 serostatus, and enrollment quarter. Outcomes were analyzed using a bayesian proportional cumulative odds model. Efficacy of CCP was defined as a cumulative adjusted odds ratio (cOR) less than 1 and a clinically meaningful effect as cOR less than 0.8.

RESULTS

Of 941 participants randomized (473 to placebo and 468 to CCP), 556 were men (59.1%); median age was 63 years (IQR, 52-73); 373 (39.6%) were Hispanic and 132 (14.0%) were non-Hispanic Black. The cOR for the primary outcome adjusted for site, baseline risk, WHO score, age, sex, and symptom duration was 0.94 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.75-1.18) with posterior probability (P[cOR<1] = 72%); the cOR for the secondary adjusted outcome was 0.92 (95% CrI, 0.74-1.16; P[cOR<1] = 76%). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity of treatment effect: at day 28, cORs were 0.72 (95% CrI, 0.46-1.13; P[cOR<1] = 93%) for participants enrolled in April-June 2020 and 0.65 (95% CrI, 0.41 to 1.02; P[cOR<1] = 97%) for those not receiving remdesivir and not receiving corticosteroids at randomization. Median CCP SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titer used in April to June 2020 was 1:175 (IQR, 76-379). Any adverse events (excluding transfusion reactions) were reported for 39 (8.2%) placebo recipients and 44 (9.4%) CCP recipients (P = .57). Transfusion reactions occurred in 2 (0.4) placebo recipients and 8 (1.7) CCP recipients (P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this trial, CCP did not meet the prespecified primary and secondary outcomes for CCP efficacy. However, high-titer CCP may have benefited participants early in the pandemic when remdesivir and corticosteroids were not in use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04364737.

摘要

重要性:在因 COVID-19 住院的患者中,使用 COVID-19 恢复期血浆(CCP)存在临床平衡。

目的:确定与安慰剂相比,在接受无创补充氧气的 COVID-19 住院患者中使用 CCP 的安全性和有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:CONTAIN COVID-19 是一项在美国 21 家医院进行的 COVID-19 住院成人中 CCP 的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,于 2020 年 4 月 17 日至 2021 年 3 月 15 日进行。该试验纳入了 941 名参与者,他们住院时间少于 3 天或症状出现后少于 7 天,需要无创氧气补充。

干预措施:大约 250 毫升 CCP 或等量的安慰剂(生理盐水)。

主要结果和测量:主要结果是随机分组后第 14 天参与者的世界卫生组织(WHO)临床改善 11 点等级量表得分;次要结果是第 28 天的 WHO 得分。亚组分析考虑了年龄、基线 WHO 评分、同时使用的药物、症状持续时间、CCP SARS-CoV-2 中和滴度、基线 SARS-CoV-2 血清状态和入组季度。结果使用贝叶斯比例累积优势模型进行分析。CCP 的疗效定义为累积调整后的优势比(cOR)小于 1,且具有临床意义的效应为 cOR 小于 0.8。

结果:在 941 名随机分配的参与者中(473 名接受安慰剂,468 名接受 CCP),556 名男性(59.1%);中位年龄为 63 岁(IQR,52-73);373 名参与者为西班牙裔,132 名参与者为非西班牙裔黑人。对站点、基线风险、WHO 评分、年龄、性别和症状持续时间进行调整的主要结局的 cOR 为 0.94(95%可信区间[CrI],0.75-1.18),后验概率(P[cOR<1] = 72%);次要调整结局的 cOR 为 0.92(95% CrI,0.74-1.16;P[cOR<1] = 76%)。探索性亚组分析表明治疗效果存在异质性:在第 28 天,2020 年 4 月至 6 月期间入组的参与者的 cOR 为 0.72(95% CrI,0.46-1.13;P[cOR<1] = 93%),未接受瑞德西韦且随机时未接受皮质类固醇的参与者的 cOR 为 0.65(95% CrI,0.41 至 1.02;P[cOR<1] = 97%)。2020 年 4 月至 6 月使用的 CCP SARS-CoV-2 中和滴度中位数为 1:175(IQR,76-379)。39 名安慰剂接受者(8.2%)和 44 名 CCP 接受者(9.4%)报告了任何不良事件(不包括输血反应)(P = .57)。2 名安慰剂接受者(0.4%)和 8 名 CCP 接受者(1.7%)发生输血反应(P = .06)。

结论和相关性:在这项试验中,CCP 未达到 CCP 疗效的预设主要和次要结局。然而,高滴度 CCP 可能在 COVID-19 大流行早期,当瑞德西韦和皮质类固醇未使用时,对参与者有益。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04364737。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fd/8669605/3deac3cac94c/jamainternmed-e216850-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验