Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2022 Mar-Apr;11(2):102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
Distinguishing between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) can be difficult on certain Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, hindering interobserver concordance. We investigated the variables influencing the interpretation of LSIL versus HSIL in Pap test slides rejected from the College of American Pathologists PAP education program.
Eleven cytologists, who were unaware of the reference interpretation, examined 21 Pap slides (11 submitted as LSIL and 10 as HSIL) rejected from the PAP education program and recorded the number of LSIL cells, HSIL cells, keratinized dysplastic cells, LSIL clusters with mixed HSIL cells, atypical squamous metaplasia, atypical glandular cells, the presence of inflammation or infectious organisms, and the overall interpretation (LSIL or HSIL). We evaluated the significance of these 11 variables using a nonlinear mixed model analysis.
LSIL had greater concordance (92 of 121 responses; 76.0% concordance) than HSIL (68 of 110 responses; 61.8% concordance; P < 0.001). The only predictors of misclassified cases were the number of atypical squamous metaplastic cells and the number of HSIL cells (P < 0.001). The more of these cells identified, the more likely the reviewers were to classify the slide as HSIL. The reproducibility of the diagnosis was fair (Gwet's agreement coefficient, 0.33).
Interobserver reproducibility is a challenge for a subset of cases with features intermediate between LSIL and HSIL. Atypical squamous metaplasia and dysplastic nuclei with a nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio greater than one half of the cell volume (HSIL) present on a Pap test influenced the likelihood that a reviewer would interpret the case as HSIL rather than LSIL.
在某些巴氏涂片(Pap)检测中,低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)和高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)之间的鉴别可能较为困难,这阻碍了观察者之间的一致性。我们研究了影响巴氏涂片检查中 LSIL 与 HSIL 判读的变量,这些涂片是从美国病理学家学院的巴氏涂片教育计划中筛选出来的。
11 位细胞学专家在不了解参考解读的情况下,检查了 21 张巴氏涂片(11 张为 LSIL,10 张为 HSIL),这些涂片是从巴氏涂片教育计划中筛选出来的,并记录了 LSIL 细胞数量、HSIL 细胞数量、角化异型细胞、混合 HSIL 细胞的 LSIL 簇、非典型鳞状化生、非典型腺细胞、炎症或感染病原体的存在以及整体解读(LSIL 或 HSIL)。我们使用非线性混合模型分析评估了这 11 个变量的意义。
LSIL 的一致性更高(121 次回应中有 92 次;76.0%的一致性),高于 HSIL(110 次回应中有 68 次;61.8%的一致性;P < 0.001)。唯一预测误诊病例的变量是不典型鳞状化生细胞数量和 HSIL 细胞数量(P < 0.001)。识别出的这些细胞越多,观察者将涂片分类为 HSIL 的可能性就越大。诊断的重现性为中等(Gwet 的一致性系数为 0.33)。
对于介于 LSIL 和 HSIL 之间的特征的病例,观察者间的可重复性是一个挑战。巴氏涂片上存在不典型鳞状化生和核/细胞质比大于细胞体积一半的异型核(HSIL)会影响观察者将病例解读为 HSIL 而不是 LSIL 的可能性。