Ogden T Heath, Whiting Michael F
Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, 401 WIDB, Provo, UT 84602-5255, USA.
Cladistics. 2003 Oct;19(5):432-442. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00313.x.
While the monophyly of winged insects (Pterygota) is well supported, phylogenetic relationships among the most basal extant pterygote lineages are problematic. Ephemeroptera (mayflies) and Odonata (dragonflies) represent the two most basal extant lineages of winged insects, and determining their relationship with regard to Neoptera (remaining winged insects) is a critical step toward understanding insect diversification. A recent molecular analysis concluded that Paleoptera (Odonata Ephemeroptera) is monophyletic. However, we demonstrate that this result is supported only under a narrow range of alignment parameters. We have further tested the monophyly of Paleoptera using additional sequence data from 18SrDNA, 28S rDNA, and Histone 3 for a broader selection of taxa and a wider range of analytical methodologies. Our results suggest that the current suite of molecular data ambiguously resolve the three basal winged insect lineages and do not provide independent confirmation of Odonata + Neoptera as supported via morphological data.
虽然有翅昆虫(有翅亚纲)的单系性得到了充分支持,但最基部现存有翅亚纲谱系之间的系统发育关系却存在问题。蜉蝣目(蜉蝣)和蜻蜓目(蜻蜓)代表了有翅昆虫的两个最基部现存谱系,确定它们与新翅类(其余有翅昆虫)的关系是理解昆虫多样化的关键一步。最近的一项分子分析得出结论,古翅类(蜻蜓目+蜉蝣目)是单系的。然而,我们证明这一结果仅在狭窄的比对参数范围内得到支持。我们使用来自18SrDNA、28S rDNA和组蛋白3的额外序列数据,对更广泛的分类群和更广泛的分析方法进一步测试了古翅类的单系性。我们的结果表明,当前的分子数据集模糊地解析了三个基部有翅昆虫谱系,并且没有提供独立的证据来证实形态学数据所支持的蜻蜓目+新翅类的关系。