Hovmöller Rasmus, Pape Thomas, Källersjö Mari
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Entomology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P. O. Box 50007, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cladistics. 2002 Jun;18(3):313-323. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00153.x.
Monophyly of the pterygote insects is generally accepted, but the relationships among the three basal branches (Odonata, Ephemeroptera and Neoptera) remain controversial. The traditional view, to separate the pterygote insects in Palaeoptera (Odonata + Ephemeroptera) and Neoptera, based on the ability or inability to fold the wings over the abdomen, has been questioned. Various authors have used different sets of morphological characters in support of all three possible arrangements of the basal pterygote branches. We sequenced 18S and 28S rDNA from 18 species of Odonata, 8 species of Ephemeroptera, 2 species of Neoptera, and 1 species of Archaeognatha in our study. The new sequences, in combination with sequences from GenBank, have been used in a parsimony jackknife analysis resulting in strong support for a monophyletic Palaeoptera. Morphological evidence and the phylogenetic implications for understanding the origin of insect flight are discussed.
有翅昆虫的单系性已被普遍接受,但三个基部类群(蜻蜓目、蜉蝣目和新翅类)之间的关系仍存在争议。基于翅膀能否在腹部上方折叠,将有翅昆虫分为古翅类(蜻蜓目 + 蜉蝣目)和新翅类的传统观点受到了质疑。不同的作者使用了不同的形态特征组合来支持基部有翅类群的所有三种可能排列方式。在我们的研究中,我们对18种蜻蜓目、8种蜉蝣目、2种新翅类和1种石蛃目的18S和28S核糖体DNA进行了测序。新序列与来自GenBank的序列相结合,用于简约自展分析,结果有力支持了古翅类的单系性。本文还讨论了形态学证据以及对理解昆虫飞行起源的系统发育意义。