• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018年美国分配政策变化对成人先天性心脏病患者的影响。

Impact of the 2018 change in US allocation policy on adults with congenital heart disease.

作者信息

Ashraf Syed Faaz, Hess Nicholas, Seese Laura, Kavarana Minoo N, Tedford Ryan J, Rajab Taufiek K, Kilic Arman

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Mar;41(3):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2021.11.006
PMID:34906403
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US adult heart allocation policy was changed on October 18, 2018. This study aims to evaluate its impact on orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to perform 2 comparisons: waitlist outcomes among listed ACHD candidates, and post-transplant outcomes in those transplanted. Waitlisted candidates were stratified by date of waitlisting: Period 1: 2010 to 2013; Period 2: 2014 to October 17, 2018 and Period 3: October 18, 2018 to March 20, 2020. Transplanted ACHD patients were similarly stratified but by date of transplantation. Competing risk regression for waitlist outcomes was performed. Post-transplant survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and seventy-six patients with ACHD were waitlisted for OHT in our study: 343(35.1%), 466(47.8%), and 167(17.1%) in periods 1, 2, and 3. Post-policy change, 1-year cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality or deterioration decreased (p = 0.02). Six hundred and forty-eight patients were transplanted: 221(34.1%), 329(50.8%) and 98(15.1%) respectively. In those transplanted, post-policy median waitlist time (174, 161 and 38 days, p < 0.001) decreased and the use of intra-aortic balloon pumps increased (1.4%, 4.9% and 19.4%, p < 0.001). Compared to periods 1 and 2, risk-adjusted post-transplant 1-year mortality was similar to period 3 (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.52-2.32; p = 0.81) (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.58-2.46, p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

The recent US allocation policy change may have resulted in reduced waitlist times and 1-year waitlist mortality for OHTs in ACHD patients. Early post-transplant outcomes appear comparable post-policy change.

摘要

背景

2018年10月18日,美国成人心脏分配政策发生了变化。本研究旨在评估其对患有先天性心脏病(ACHD)的成人原位心脏移植(OHT)的影响。

方法

使用器官共享联合网络数据库进行两项比较:登记的ACHD候选者的等待名单结果,以及已移植者的移植后结果。将等待名单上的候选者按登记日期分层:第1期:2010年至2013年;第2期:2014年至2018年10月17日;第3期:2018年10月18日至2020年3月20日。已移植的ACHD患者按移植日期进行类似分层。对等待名单结果进行竞争风险回归分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和多变量Cox回归分析移植后的生存率。

结果

在我们的研究中,976例ACHD患者被列入OHT等待名单:第1期、第2期和第3期分别为343例(35.1%)、466例(47.8%)和167例(17.1%)。政策改变后,等待名单上死亡或病情恶化的1年累积发生率下降(p = 0.02)。648例患者接受了移植:分别为221例(34.1%)、329例(50.8%)和98例(15.1%)。在已移植者中,政策改变后等待名单的中位时间(174天、161天和38天,p < 0.001)缩短,主动脉内球囊泵的使用增加(1.4%、4.9%和19.4%,p < 0.001)。与第1期和第2期相比,风险调整后的移植后1年死亡率与第3期相似(风险比1.10,95%置信区间0.52 - 2.32;p = 0.81)(风险比1.19,95%置信区间0.58 - 2.46,p = 0.63)。

结论

美国最近的分配政策变化可能导致ACHD患者OHT的等待时间和等待名单上的1年死亡率降低。政策改变后早期移植后结果似乎相当。

相似文献

1
Impact of the 2018 change in US allocation policy on adults with congenital heart disease.2018年美国分配政策变化对成人先天性心脏病患者的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Mar;41(3):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
2
The Impact of Local Programmatic Decisions on Outcomes in Transplant-Listed Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.地方规划决策对移植名单中先天性心脏病成年患者结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2024 Sep;30(9):1124-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Impact of new allocation policy on waitlist and transplant outcomes of adult congenital heart patients supported with ECMO.ECMO 支持的成人先天性心脏病患者候补名单和移植结果的新分配政策的影响。
Artif Organs. 2024 Aug;48(8):912-920. doi: 10.1111/aor.14738. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Changes in waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in patients with adult congenital heart disease after the new heart transplant allocation system.新心脏移植分配制度后成人先天性心脏病患者在等待名单和移植后结局的变化。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Nov;35(11):e14458. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14458. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
5
Utilization and outcomes of expanded criteria donors in adults with congenital heart disease.先天性心脏病成人患者中扩大标准供体的利用情况及结局
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Oct;43(10):1691-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Donor Characteristics and Recipient Outcomes After Heart Transplantation in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.成人先天性心脏病心脏移植后的供体特征和受体结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e020248. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020248. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Impact of the new UNOS donor heart allocation system on waitlist outcomes and early posttransplant mortality among adults with congenital heart disease.新的 UNOS 供体心脏分配系统对成人先天性心脏病患者等待名单结果和移植后早期死亡率的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Apr;22(4):1123-1132. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16900. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.2018 年心脏分配政策变化后成人心脏移植的发展趋势。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):159-167. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4909.
9
Revised Heart Allocation Policy Improved Waitlist Mortality and Waiting Time With Maintained Outcomes in En-Bloc Heart-Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients.修订后的心脏分配政策改善了整块心肺移植候选人和受者的候补死亡率和等待时间,同时保持了结果。
Transpl Int. 2023 Dec 13;36:11956. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11956. eCollection 2023.
10
Regional differences in recipient waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant mortality after the 2006 United Network for Organ Sharing policy changes in the donor heart allocation algorithm.2006年器官共享联合网络(United Network for Organ Sharing)对供体心脏分配算法进行政策调整后,受者等待名单时间以及移植前后死亡率的地区差异。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):166-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.005.