Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4,
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 15;44:e186. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21001151.
Clarke and Beck use behavioural evidence to argue that (1) approximate ratio computations are sufficient for claiming that the approximate number system (ANS) represents the rationals, and (2) the ANS does not represent the reals. We argue that pure behaviour is a poor litmus test for this problem, and that we should trust the psychophysical models that place ANS representations within the reals.
（1）近似比率计算足以证明近似数量系统 (ANS) 代表有理数，以及（2）ANS 不代表实数。我们认为，纯粹的行为是检验这个问题的一个糟糕标准，我们应该相信那些将 ANS 表示置于实数范围内的心理物理模型。
