Ishii Naohiro, Ando Jiro, Kiuchi Tomoki, Uno Takahiro, Kishi Kazuo
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Nasushiobara City, Japan.
Department of Breast Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya City, Japan.
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):305-310. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_113_20.
Several kinds of tapes are used for postoperative wounds, which occasionally cause contact dermatitis and result in noticeable pigmentation. A comparison of the postoperative course between different tapes has not been reported. This study aimed at investigating the differences between two postoperative tapes used after breast reconstruction with silicone materials for simple mastectomy.
Eighty-eight nonconsecutive patients undergoing tissue expander operation and 75 nonconsecutive patients undergoing tissue expander and silicone breast implant operations were included in this prospective study. Two postoperative tapes were used: a nonwoven surgical tape (Yu-ki ban) or a hypoallergenic polyester-woven fabric tape (Atofine ), which have different base materials, a removed keratinocyte area, and moisture permeability. We determined the differences in the incidence of skin complications, scar width, and aesthetic results with respect to scarring between the patients using Yu-ki ban and those using Atofine.
Statistically similar results were achieved for the patients who underwent reconstruction using either the tissue expander or silicone breast implant. Scar width was similar between the groups; however, the incidence of skin complications was significantly lower in patients using Atofine than in those using Yu-ki ban. Aesthetic results with respect to scarring were better in patients using Atofine than in those using Yu-ki ban, with a significant difference in the incidence of pigmentation between the groups.
The tape with higher moisture permeability and a lower removed keratinocyte area should be used to reduce the incidence of contact dermatitis and achieve better aesthetic results with respect to scarring.
几种胶带用于术后伤口,偶尔会引起接触性皮炎并导致明显色素沉着。不同胶带术后病程的比较尚未见报道。本研究旨在调查在单纯乳房切除术后使用硅胶材料进行乳房重建后所使用的两种术后胶带之间的差异。
本前瞻性研究纳入了88例非连续性接受组织扩张器手术的患者和75例非连续性接受组织扩张器及硅胶乳房植入手术的患者。使用了两种术后胶带:一种非织造手术胶带(Yu-ki ban)或一种低过敏性聚酯编织胶带(Atofine),它们具有不同的基材、去除角质形成细胞面积和透湿性。我们确定了使用Yu-ki ban的患者与使用Atofine的患者在皮肤并发症发生率、瘢痕宽度以及瘢痕美学效果方面的差异。
接受组织扩张器或硅胶乳房植入重建的患者在统计学上取得了相似的结果。两组之间瘢痕宽度相似;然而,使用Atofine的患者皮肤并发症发生率显著低于使用Yu-ki ban的患者。使用Atofine的患者瘢痕的美学效果优于使用Yu-ki ban的患者,两组之间色素沉着发生率存在显著差异。
应使用透湿性较高且去除角质形成细胞面积较低的胶带,以降低接触性皮炎的发生率,并在瘢痕方面取得更好的美学效果。