• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Women's Experiences and Involvement in Decision-Making in Relation to Planned Cesarean Birth: An Interview Study.女性在计划剖宫产决策中的经历与参与:一项访谈研究。
J Perinat Educ. 2021 Oct 1;30(4):213-222. doi: 10.1891/J-PE-D-20-00034.
2
Women's experiences of intrapartum care and recovery in relation to planned caesarean sections: An interview study.女性在计划剖宫产术中的产时护理和恢复体验:一项访谈研究。
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):e248-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study.与计划分娩背景下妇女分娩信念和决策经验相关的因素:一项调查研究。
Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102944. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102944. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
'It will dictate how many children I will have"- Women's decision-making in pregnancy following a previous caesarean birth (CB).“这将决定我会生几个孩子”——既往剖宫产术后女性孕期的决策
Midwifery. 2023 Jan;116:103533. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103533. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
5
Women's experiences and satisfaction with having a cesarean birth: An integrative review.女性对剖宫产的体验和满意度:综合评价。
Birth. 2020 Jun;47(2):169-182. doi: 10.1111/birt.12478. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
6
Labouring Together: Women's experiences of "Getting the care that I want and need" in maternity care.共同努力:女性在分娩护理中获得“我想要和需要的护理”的体验。
Midwifery. 2022 Oct;113:103420. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103420. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
7
Women's experiences of their involvement around care decisions during a subsequent pregnancy after a previous caesarean birth in Western Australia.澳大利亚西部女性在前次剖宫产术后再次妊娠时对其参与照护决策的体验。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):e442-e450. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
9
Exploring women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain.探讨女性在分娩期间参与共同决策的体验:西班牙一家参考医院的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 17;21(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04070-3.
10
Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study.女性对计划性剖宫产决策和信念的体验:一项调查研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Feb;61(1):106-115. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13255. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Provider Perspectives on Cesarean Delivery Pain and Anesthesia Experiences: A Qualitative Study.患者与医护人员对剖宫产疼痛及麻醉体验的观点:一项定性研究
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025 Aug 1;6(1):711-722. doi: 10.1177/26884844251364123. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient and provider perspectives on pain and other dimensions of anesthesia experience for cesarean delivery: A qualitative study.剖宫产分娩中患者与医护人员对疼痛及麻醉体验其他方面的看法:一项定性研究。
Res Sq. 2024 Aug 30:rs.3.rs-4814545. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4814545/v1.
3
Examining provider practice-level disparities in delivery outcomes among patients with a history of Cesarean Delivery.检查有剖宫产史的患者在分娩结局方面的提供者实践水平差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 5;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06458-3.
4
Conflicting attitudes between clinicians and women regarding maternal requested caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.临床医生和女性对产妇要求剖宫产的态度存在冲突:定性证据综合评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05471-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study.女性对剖宫产术后恢复、感染和 PREPS 试验的看法:一项定性试点研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8.
2
Indications for, and timing of, planned caesarean section: A systematic analysis of clinical guidelines.计划性剖宫产的适应证和时机:临床指南的系统分析。
Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Measuring labor and delivery unit culture and clinicians' attitudes toward birth: Revision and validation of the Labor Culture Survey.测量产房文化和临床医生对分娩的态度:劳动文化调查的修订和验证。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):300-310. doi: 10.1111/birt.12406. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
5
Perspectives, Decision Making, and Final Mode of Delivery in Pregnant Women With a Previous C-Section in a General Hospital in Peru: Prospective Analysis.秘鲁一家综合医院既往有剖宫产史孕妇的分娩视角、决策制定及最终分娩方式:前瞻性分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Aug 8;2(2):2381468317724409. doi: 10.1177/2381468317724409. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec.
6
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术对母婴及后续妊娠的长期风险和获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23;15(1):e1002494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study.改善要求剖宫产的女性的护理路径:一项基于经验的协同设计研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1134-2.
9
How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.你是如何选择分娩方式的?来自土耳其的初产妇的经历。
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):359-67. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.足月初产妇剖宫产率及产科结局的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):702-11. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13281. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

女性在计划剖宫产决策中的经历与参与:一项访谈研究。

Women's Experiences and Involvement in Decision-Making in Relation to Planned Cesarean Birth: An Interview Study.

作者信息

Thirukumar Purshaiyna, Henry Amanda, Coates Dominiek

出版信息

J Perinat Educ. 2021 Oct 1;30(4):213-222. doi: 10.1891/J-PE-D-20-00034.

DOI:10.1891/J-PE-D-20-00034
PMID:34908820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663766/
Abstract

Actively engaging women in decision-making about their own care is critical to providing woman-centered maternity care. The aim was to understand women's mode-of-birth preferences and shared decision-making experiences during planned cesarean birth (CB). Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 33 women who had planned CB at eight Australian metropolitan hospitals. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo-12. Many women preferred a vaginal birth but were willing to have a CB if the clinician recommended. Most women looked to their clinicians for information and guidance. Although many women reported receiving enough information to make informed decisions, others felt pressured into having or not having a CB, or expected to make decisions themselves. Women wished for longer consultation times, more information, and care continuity.

摘要

让女性积极参与自身护理的决策,对于提供以女性为中心的孕产护理至关重要。目的是了解女性在计划剖宫产(CB)期间的分娩方式偏好和共同决策经历。对澳大利亚八家大都市医院计划进行剖宫产的33名女性进行了半结构化电话访谈。使用NVivo - 12进行归纳主题分析。许多女性更喜欢顺产,但如果临床医生建议,她们愿意接受剖宫产。大多数女性向临床医生寻求信息和指导。尽管许多女性表示获得了足够的信息来做出明智的决定,但其他人感到在接受或不接受剖宫产方面受到压力,或者期望自己做出决定。女性希望有更长的咨询时间、更多的信息和护理连续性。