Suppr超能文献

普通皮肤科医疗服务提供者的患者满意度:对38008条在线评论的定量和定性分析

Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatology Providers: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews.

作者信息

Queen Dawn, Trager Megan H, Fan Weijia, Samie Faramarz H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Lankenau Medical Center, Main Line Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

JID Innov. 2021 Aug 19;1(4):100049. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100049. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Measuring patient satisfaction of general dermatology providers is an important goal because it can lead to improved clinical outcomes. Online reviews are emerging as the newest forum for evaluating physicians in real time and provide a valuable tool for measuring patient satisfaction. We analyzed both quantitative and qualitative online reviews of general dermatology providers at 121 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‒accredited dermatology programs across the country to determine which elements are most discussed in online ratings using the online platforms Vitals, US News, WebMD, Google Reviews, and Healthgrades. There were 38,008 online reviews included from general dermatology providers at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‒accredited programs. The median average overall quantitative rating of providers was 4.35 of 5. There were more positive (77%) than negative (23%) comments. The overall ratings of general dermatology providers were favorable. The most influential factors in both positive and negative comments were patient's perceived experience and physician's bedside manner (26% and 17%, respectively). Less important factors included office space, treatment by auxiliary staff, wait time, costs, and time spent with patients. This suggests that a provider's personality, expressed compassion, empathy, and kindness may overcome other issues and create an overall positive experience.

摘要

衡量普通皮肤科医疗服务提供者的患者满意度是一个重要目标,因为这可以带来更好的临床结果。在线评论正在成为实时评估医生的最新平台,并为衡量患者满意度提供了一个有价值的工具。我们分析了全国121个经研究生医学教育认证委员会认证的皮肤科项目中普通皮肤科医疗服务提供者的定量和定性在线评论,以确定使用Vitals、《美国新闻与世界报道》、WebMD、谷歌评论和Healthgrades等在线平台在在线评级中讨论最多的因素。来自研究生医学教育认证委员会认证项目的普通皮肤科医疗服务提供者共有38008条在线评论。提供者的总体定量评分中位数为4.35(满分5分)。正面评论(77%)多于负面评论(23%)。普通皮肤科医疗服务提供者的总体评分是正面的。正面和负面评论中最具影响力的因素分别是患者的感知体验和医生的床边态度(分别为26%和17%)。不太重要的因素包括办公空间、辅助人员的治疗、等待时间、费用以及与患者相处的时间。这表明提供者的个性、表现出的同情心、同理心和善良可能会克服其他问题,并创造出总体上积极的体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21d4/8659734/e7331ef058cc/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验